WISCONSIN MARRIAGE DEFENDERS

The chronicles of the Wisconsin Marriage Defenders of Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Sunday, August 29, 2010

DOES IT MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

*



Do the protests of the Wisconsin Marriage Defenders make a difference? The answer is a resounding and emphatic YES!



EXHIBIT A:



A few years ago, Oshkosh was a homo hotbed in Wisconsin. Pastor Ralph Ovadal, who has been doing this for over 20 years, told us that, aside from Madison, he received more hateful and threatening calls and letters from Oshkosh than any other city in Wisconsin, including Green Bay, Appleton, Racine, Kenosha, etc. Many of the State's prominent homosexuals and lesbians were based in Oshkosh.



But we started appearing at their rallies and having our own rallies, and since the year we started there has not been a single open homosexual event in Oshkosh. Their publicity has been confined to the pages of the lavender lapdog Oshkosh Northwestern, which now has so little circulation and influence as to be irrelevant.



We have effectively run them out of town. Green Bay could do the same if they weren't bigger sissies than the sodomites. It's not that difficult. All it takes is a few godly men to stand.



Prov 28:1 The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.



Deut 32:30 How should one chase a thousand, and two put ten thousand to flight, except their Rock had sold them, and the LORD had shut them up?



EXHIBIT B:



There were only a handful of us for the last protest in Green Bay. Our church was having its Vacation Bible School, and several dozen of our best men were involved in that and could not come to Green Bay with us. Of course we have already noted the total lack of support from Green Bay Baptist churches (they will be raking in some awards shortly).



In fact, I suggested to Al that because our representation would be so sparse, we might be better off to stay home this time. Al decried, "No way. We have to make a representation even if we are the only ones. You already took a day off work and we're already here. We've got to go now." So off we went.



As it turned out, despite our low turnout, the news media gave us equal, if not better, coverage in their website and on TV. Had we not gone, the news coverage would've been 100% pro-homosexual. Instead we got 50% of the coverage, and their 50% came with the baggage of knowing they were being opposed.



EXHIBIT C:



Oshkosh and Lacrosse are very similar in both being UW college towns of similar size. Both colleges are typically liberal and pro-homo. We are also saddled with the most pro-homo newspaper I've ever seen that was not declared to be a homosexual publication (like the "Blade").



When the One-man/One-woman marriage bill was being debated and voted on, we, of course, spent most of our time in Oshkosh. Oshkosh voted to pass the bill by a 60%-40% margin, while Lacrosse voted against the bill, instead supporting queer marriage. Our actions helped make a 20 point difference.

*

Saturday, August 28, 2010

LACROSSE QUEERS CAUGHT OFF GUARD

*


Nine members of Wisconsin Marriage Defenders made the trek to Lacrosse, WI to protest their "Pridefest". Lacrosse is one of the few areas in Wisconsin that voted in favor of queer marriage, as evidenced by the city's official recognition of the event (http://www.cityoflacrosse.org/index.aspx?nid=1319).


We've done several "protests" in our Oshkosh/Fox Valley/Green Bay area. The queers here are familiar with us and are more willing to have rational conversation. We caught this gang in Lacrosse off guard. They did little but rant and wail.


We did have some conversations with a few individuals, but not many wanted to talk. They just accused us of hate. As one of my posters said, if we truly hated them, we'd let them die and go to hell. We're there because we don't want that destruction for them.


First they tried screeching at us, probably thinking that would intimidate us into leaving. (Yawn) Hardly. Then they made up some of their own signs, hoping to run us off that way. Nope. Then they called the cops on us, but when the cop came, he couldn't do anything to us even if he wanted to, because they had their posters out as well (and they were blocking a fire hydrant). The cop left and the queers went back inside.


Within the first few minutes of our arrival one tough-looking woman came from behind me squawking loudly, "Why are you guys spreading hate and harassing people?!"


I responded, "I'm just standing here holding a sign. I haven't harrassed anyone. I haven't even said a word to anyone. You're the one who just confronted me, and you're the one yelling."


80% of what we got from them was accusations of being hateful and intolerant. But they were the most intolerant queer group we've encountered. One alleged atheist (from Minnesota) told a WMD member that everything would be rosy with the world if all the Christians would be eliminated. Talk about hate and intolerance!


Several of them made comments such as, "Don't you guys have anything better to do than stand out here with those signs?" A half hour later they were standing among us holding their own signs.


MANY thanks to Pastor Rick Sella and West Salem Baptist Church for joining us. It was great to have a church from the area join us (See Bay City? That's all you have to do to get commended instead of condemned. We're not asking that much.).

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of MARINES DON'T WANT QUEER BUNKMATES

*



Most US Marines don't want gay roommates: General Conway



"I can tell you that an overwhelming majority would like not to be roomed with a person who is openly homosexual," Conway told a Pentagon press conference.



TG: Yet our gov't wants to force straights to bunk and shower with queers anyway. And conservative Christians still enthusiastically support our military and their unconstitutional and ungodly actions. WHY?




Is our military a place for social experimentation or is their purpose to protect our country? Should we allow THEM to make those decisions? Or should we force them to do things that might render them ineffective at defending our country?




Should we put the survival of our country at stake to coddle the queers? Especially since no society that has ever embraced homosexuality has survived?

COUSINS MARRYING COUSINS

*




Cousins marrying cousins: 700 babies born in the U.K. with genetic disabilities


TG: No doubt the pro-homo marriage crowd must come out in support of these CONSENTING ADULTS who simply want to marry the ones the love. The homosexuals certainly wouldn't want to DISCRIMINATE against people simply because of their sexual preferences and relationships they were BORN into. Why, that would make them HYPOCRITES.

*

Monday, August 16, 2010

NO FEMININE GIRLS ALLOWED?

*



How can this be if they were "born" that way?



http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-adrenal-20100815,0,5576220.story



A hormonal treatment to prevent ambiguous genitalia can now be offered to women who may be carrying such infants. It's not without health risks, but to its critics those are of small consequence compared with this notable side effect: The treatment might reduce the likelihood that a female with the condition will be homosexual.



HORRORS!



Further, it seems to increase the chances that she will have what are considered more feminine behavioral traits.



That such a treatment would ever be considered, even to prevent genital abnormalities, has outraged gay and lesbian groups, troubled some doctors and fueled bioethicists' debate about the nature of human sexuality.



TG: What this article exposes is that these people are more apt to be homosexual because of a DISORDER and when the disorder is cleared up the girls are less likely to be lezzies and will have more feminine traits. Where's the problem?

*