WISCONSIN MARRIAGE DEFENDERS

The chronicles of the Wisconsin Marriage Defenders of Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Monday, February 26, 2007

QUEER ESCAPE FROM REALITY

*


Recently a sodomite advocate with a screen name of Black Tsunami (AKA A. McEwen ) sent a comment to the latest entry on this blog.

I went to his blog, called "Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters" and saw that he has lost all contact with reality. Look at what his description says:

For two years, I have studied "so-called" pro family "research" regarding the gay community and have found a disturbing pattern of deception. In 2007, my book, Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters will be published, detailing all of my findings. The purpose of this blog is to give updates of my work and to show some of my findings.

McEwen wants to see deception to document in his book? Here's some for him!

In the Wisconsin vote a yes vote was to create an amendment in the State Constitution that fortified the one-man, one-woman marriage statute that already existed. It was a redundancy necessary to keep rogue courts from striking it down. A no vote would permit the lavendar lobby to find a perverted judge who might overrule the law.

But here's the spin the deceiving dogs put on.

This is what reader Jon Eiche of Muskego recorded from his phone. Richard Ives reported receiving the same phone call.

"Hi, this is Sue. Today is election day, and when you go to vote, I urge you to remember our children. I urge you to vote No on the constitutional amendment on gay marriage. Vote No to send a message that some things are too important to change. In Wisconsin, marriage is a man and a woman. Vote No to make sure activist judges don't get involved and determine what marriage might mean, like they have in other states. Vote No to protect our children, our families, and our way of life. Vote No on the gay marriage amendment." Authorized and paid for by Fair Wisconsin Committee, Michael Childress, Treasurer."

Look particularly at the two bolded phrases and how deceptive they are:

{{ In Wisconsin, marriage is a man and a woman. Vote No to make sure activist judges don't get involved and determine what marriage might mean }}

To any reasonable person, this looks like support for one man, one woman marriage, as we currently have it in Wisconsin and a 'no' vote prevents an activist judge from redefining marriage. No doubt the first thing (UN)Fair Wisconsin will do now is to try and get some activist judge to redefine marrige.

{{ Vote No to protect our children, our families, and our way of life. Vote No on the gay marriage amendment. }}

Anyone reading this would think there is an amendment for gay marriage on the ballot and they certainly want to vote against gay marriage, so they'd vote 'no' on the amendment. After all, in Wisconsin, marriage is a man and a woman and we want to protect our children, our families, and our way of life.

Of course the actual amendment is for one-man one -woman marriage, NOT gay marriage, which totally reverses how one would vote.

If a sodomite would perform the perverted activities that they do, it should be no big surprise that they'd like like the devil.

John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

They know if they let people vote on the merits of the bill, it would pass overwhelmingly. Rather than refuting the bill on the merits (or lack thereof) of their position, the lavendar liars opted to intentionally try to confuse voters into voting the opposite of what they truly wanted.

The Black Tsunami is all wet.

Saturday, February 24, 2007

MASS. FORCE FEEDING of HOMO AGENDA

*

Here's yet another example of how bigoted and intolerant the lavendar lobby truly is. This demonstrates once again, that despite their lying statements to the contrary, they are not after equal rights, they are after forcing their perversion upon all of society society. They are not looking to be left alone to practice their perversion in private. They want to cram their deathstyle down our throats.


LAW OF THE LAND

February 24, 2007 By Bob Unruh © 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Judge orders 'gay' agenda taught to Christian children

Rules kids need teachings to be 'engaged and productive citizens


A federal judge in Massachusetts has ordered the "gay" agenda taught to Christians who attend a public school in Massachusetts, finding that they need the teachings to be "engaged and productive citizens."


TG: Believe me, I have taught my kids the "gay" agenda. Why, just this week we watched the public rally I hosted a couple of years ago. They got to see firsthand the queers chant "My gay sweet home" when our group finished singing "God Bless America" ("My home sweet home"). They got to see the sodomites mock everything decent, but silenced whenever documented facts were brought up. They got to see the sissies try to intimidate a woman State Rep., but stand in scared silence when the man State Rep. spoke. They got to see the queers cheer when we were referred to as the Taliban. Oh, my kids are well aware of the "gay" agenda.


U.S. District Judge Mark L. Wolf yesterday dismissed a civil rights lawsuit brought by David Parker, ordering that it is reasonable, indeed there is an obligation, for public schools to teach young children to accept and endorse homosexuality.


"Wolf's ruling is every parent's nightmare. It goes to extraordinary lengths to legitimize and reinforce the 'right' (and even the duty) of schools to normalize homosexual behavior to even the youngest of children," said a statement from the pro-family group Mass Resistance. "In the ruling, Wolf makes the absurd claim that normalizing homosexuality to young children is 'reasonably related to the goals of preparing students to become engaged and productive citizens in our democracy.'


Wolf makes the odious statement that the Parkers' only options are (1) send their kids to a private school, (2) home-school their kids, or (3) elect a majority of people to the School Committee who agree with them. Can you imagine a federal judge in the Civil Rights era telling blacks the same thing – that if they can't be served at a lunch counter they should just start their own restaurant, or elect a city council to pass laws that reflect the U.S. Constitution?"


But the judge concluded that even allowing Christians to withdraw their children from classes or portions of classes where the religious beliefs were being violated wasn't a reasonable expectation. "An exodus from class when issues of homosexuality or same-sex marriage are to be discussed could send the message that gays, lesbians, and the children of same-sex parents are inferior and, therefore, have a damaging effect on those students," he opined.

Friday, February 02, 2007

CANADIAN IN-TOLERANCE

*

Canadian City Councillor Fined $1000 for Saying Homosexuality “not Normal or Natural”

KAMLOOPS, BC, January 18, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A Catholic city councillor in Kamloops, British Columbia, who was himself the victim of the crime of vandalism due to his faith, has been forced to apologize and pay a homosexual activist couple $1000. The couple filed a complaint with the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal which was accepted and was to go to the hearing stage.

Strangely, it was councillor who was shown true discrimination worthy of a human rights complaint. In June, the councillor opposed a homosexual pride proclamation, after which his barber shop was vandalized with "Homophobia Die" scrawled on the door of his business.

In the June interview with LifeSiteNews.com he explained, "I'm not against lesbian and gay people, but I don't agree that I should have to endorse it." He also said that people can do what they like in the privacy of their own homes, but, he said in reference to gay pride parades, they shouldn't "go out and flaunt it, in front of people who don't necessarily agree."

TG: What a chilling assault on free speech. Canadians can't even say homosexuality is "unnatural"? Of course it's unnatural. There's nothing natural about sperm being deposited into feces.

If a queer made a statement that belief in the rapture or resurrection is "unnatural", do you think he'd have to pay a $1,000 fine? Of course not, becuase Canada represents intolerance, bigotry, descrimination, and hate.