The chronicles of the Wisconsin Marriage Defenders of Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Monday, February 26, 2007



Recently a sodomite advocate with a screen name of Black Tsunami (AKA A. McEwen ) sent a comment to the latest entry on this blog.

I went to his blog, called "Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters" and saw that he has lost all contact with reality. Look at what his description says:

For two years, I have studied "so-called" pro family "research" regarding the gay community and have found a disturbing pattern of deception. In 2007, my book, Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters will be published, detailing all of my findings. The purpose of this blog is to give updates of my work and to show some of my findings.

McEwen wants to see deception to document in his book? Here's some for him!

In the Wisconsin vote a yes vote was to create an amendment in the State Constitution that fortified the one-man, one-woman marriage statute that already existed. It was a redundancy necessary to keep rogue courts from striking it down. A no vote would permit the lavendar lobby to find a perverted judge who might overrule the law.

But here's the spin the deceiving dogs put on.

This is what reader Jon Eiche of Muskego recorded from his phone. Richard Ives reported receiving the same phone call.

"Hi, this is Sue. Today is election day, and when you go to vote, I urge you to remember our children. I urge you to vote No on the constitutional amendment on gay marriage. Vote No to send a message that some things are too important to change. In Wisconsin, marriage is a man and a woman. Vote No to make sure activist judges don't get involved and determine what marriage might mean, like they have in other states. Vote No to protect our children, our families, and our way of life. Vote No on the gay marriage amendment." Authorized and paid for by Fair Wisconsin Committee, Michael Childress, Treasurer."

Look particularly at the two bolded phrases and how deceptive they are:

{{ In Wisconsin, marriage is a man and a woman. Vote No to make sure activist judges don't get involved and determine what marriage might mean }}

To any reasonable person, this looks like support for one man, one woman marriage, as we currently have it in Wisconsin and a 'no' vote prevents an activist judge from redefining marriage. No doubt the first thing (UN)Fair Wisconsin will do now is to try and get some activist judge to redefine marrige.

{{ Vote No to protect our children, our families, and our way of life. Vote No on the gay marriage amendment. }}

Anyone reading this would think there is an amendment for gay marriage on the ballot and they certainly want to vote against gay marriage, so they'd vote 'no' on the amendment. After all, in Wisconsin, marriage is a man and a woman and we want to protect our children, our families, and our way of life.

Of course the actual amendment is for one-man one -woman marriage, NOT gay marriage, which totally reverses how one would vote.

If a sodomite would perform the perverted activities that they do, it should be no big surprise that they'd like like the devil.

John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

They know if they let people vote on the merits of the bill, it would pass overwhelmingly. Rather than refuting the bill on the merits (or lack thereof) of their position, the lavendar liars opted to intentionally try to confuse voters into voting the opposite of what they truly wanted.

The Black Tsunami is all wet.


  • At 6:20 AM, Blogger BlackTsunami said…

    Your post is oonfusing. My post was about the David Parker case, not same-sex marriage in Wisconsin.

  • At 9:29 AM, Anonymous Al Doyle said…

    Dogs bark, birs fly, cats chase mice and sodomites tell lies. It's natural and predictable.

  • At 12:00 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    If my post is confusing it's because I QUOTED from your blog that you were looking for deception relating to the homosexual "rights" issue.

    I showed you irrefutable proof that the deception is coming from the queer proponents.

    Since you cannot refute the obvious truth, the best you can do is profess confusion.

    BTW, any chance you are a florist? The most infamous sodomite in town here is a hairdresser. The other noted queer here runs an art gallery. Another who responded to this blog is an interior designer. All we need is a florist to have all the stereotypes covered.

  • At 7:17 PM, Blogger BlackTsunami said…

    My post was about the David Parker situation. Your response had nothing to do with what I said.

    Just wanted to make that clear. Despite the fact that we disagree with each other, I was hoping that there could be a civil discussion. I guess I am wrong because of the low mentality of the source I am dealing with.

    Your name calling only serves to expose your mindset and thereby make us stronger my friend.

    Thanks for the support :D

  • At 12:45 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    Who did I call a name? Can you point out what the name was?

    The Parker situation was a situation in which the lavendar lobby wants to FORCE the rest of us to be subjected to the sodomite agenda.

    If you want a civil discussion, you must first acknowledge that truth. If you want to hide behind a lie, you can hardly claim you want a civil discussion without adding another lie to the heap.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home