WISCONSIN MARRIAGE DEFENDERS: March 2009

INCEST SPREADING?

*

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/21/world/main4881279.shtml?source=mostpop_story

Here we see Romania seeking to become the fourth European nation to legalize incest. About 20 States in the U.S. decriminalize incest to some degree.

Down below we saw that bestiality is not illegal in several places.

If homosexuals are allowed to have their activities considered "marriage", why could not these other groups use the same logic for their proclivities?

The claim is that two homosexuals are "consenting adults". Well, so are a father and an adult daughter, or an adult brother and sister. Why couldn't they get "married" if homosexuals can?

What about homosexual incest? They couldn't even reproduce, so there is no risk of danger to offspring - which is the reason for incest being illegal in the first place. Would incest between two brothers or two sisters be okay? Why not?

The homosexual marriage movement leads us directly to these things, no matter how badly the queers want to claim there is no connection. Several articles have already been posted here proving those other groups are purposely following the prancing footsteps of the light-loafers.

The homosexuals can try to deny the other perverts (incest, bestiality, polygamists, pedophiles, etc.), but their denials are hollow. There is absolutely a connection between the perversion of sodomy and those other perversions. If queer marriage is permitted, there is no reason to deny many of those other perversions.

Ultimately what matters is what God said was right and wrong about such things.

QUEERS HAVE POOR CHILDREN

*

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-03-20-gay-poverty_N.htm

QUEERLY BELOVED

Children of same-sex parents more likely to be poor

Twice as likely to live in poverty as those of traditional married couples

Study looks at poor among gays, lesbians

By Andrea Stone, USA TODAY

Lesbian couples are more likely to be poor than married heterosexuals, and children of same-sex parents are twice as likely to live in poverty as those of traditional married couples, a new report shows.

TG: Because they don't have families to support, homosexuals generally make more money than their straight co-workers, as has been shown on previous WMD blog entries. How selfish and pitiful that their children are poorer than children of straight people. The love of many shall wax cold. Of course we realize that queer couples cannot produce theri own children.

UCLA's Williams Institute, which studies gay issues, says its report out today is the first to analyze poverty among gay and lesbian couples.The report is an analysis of the most recent data on same-sex unmarried partners from the 2000 Census and two smaller surveys that include questions on sexual orientation. Together, it argues, they debunk "a popular stereotype (that) paints lesbians and gay men as an affluent elite."

MERRIAM-WEBSTER REDEFINES "MARRIAGE"

*

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91995

Webster's dictionary redefines 'marriage'

Now includes references to same-sex relationships

One of the nation's most prominent dictionary companies has resolved the argument over whether the term "marriage" should apply to same-sex duos or be reserved for the institution that has held families together for millennia: by simply writing a new definition.

"I was shocked to see that Merriam-Webster changed their definition of the word 'marriage,' a word which has referred exclusively to a contract between a man and a woman for centuries. It has now added same sex," YouTube user Eric B. noted to WND. He created a YouTube video illustrating his concerns, which has been embedded here.

One commenter on the YouTube site said it's just part of the campaign by homosexual activists to take control of the definition of the word and make it align with their goals.

A dictionary version from 1913 that has been posted online not only didn't mention same-sex "marriage," it supplemented its definition of traditional marriage with references from the Bible.

QUEERS KILL

*

Evolutionists claim evolution is a way to preserve species and some have claimed that homosexuality evolved to curb overpopulation. Here's a species of duck that is homosexually evolving itself into extinction. This must be a real dilemma for liberal evolutionary environmentalists. Do they want to save the ducks or support the sodomites?

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_3231673.html?menu=

Gay drakes foil breeding plan

A bid to save a rare species of duck from extinction in the UK seem doomed after the last two males fell for each other.

Keepers at a West Sussex bird sanctuary hoped Cherry, Britain's last remaining female Blue Duck, might mate with either of the drakes, Ben or Jerry.But neither male duck appeared interested and are now inseparable at the Arundel Wetland Centre, reports the Daily Telegraph.

Centre warden Paul Stevens said: "They stay together all the time, parading up and down their enclosure and whistling to each other as a male might do with a female he wants to mate with."

People who visit the centre think they're a fantastic couple, without really coming around to the idea that they are two males."

Blue ducks originate from New Zealand but there were thought to be just three birds in the UK.

Keepers initially introduced Ben to Cherry, but neither seemed keen. They then brought Jerry down from a sanctuary in London.

Mr Stevens said: "Cherry showed some interest in him. She displayed typical mating behaviour - she approached him and called to him, she even looked like she was nesting. We thought it was great and it was all going to happen but nothing ever did."

Mr Stevens said the male ducks were then placed in the same enclosure: "To our surprise the two males really took to each other and it was obvious that they really liked each other."

It would have been nice to get a last clutch of eggs from Cherry but Ben and Jerry do make a lovely couple."