APPLE GAY APP

*

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57615616-71/apple-approves-only-gay-social-app-for-ages-12-and-up/

 

Apple approves 'only gay social app for ages 12 and up'

The founders of Distinc.tt believe it's time for a gay social app that doesn't have sex at its core. This is an app that "you can bring home to Mom."

TG: {{ a gay social app that doesn't have sex at its core }}

What? That's like having a black social app that doesn't have race at its core, or a sports social app that doesn't have sports at its core.

OF COURSE it has sex at its core! That's the determining factor in making one "gay".

The reason they claim it's not? If there was a "hetero" app that brought 12-15 year old girls in contact with 20 or 30 year old men, that would be considered STATUTORY RAPE or PEDOPHILIA! But if it's labeled "gay", they can get away it, although it still is statutory rape and pedophilia (in addition to the sodomite perversion).

MAN OF THE YEAR!?

*

http://www.advocate.com/year-review/2013/12/16/advocates-person-year-pope-francis

It's no surprise that Time Magazine would name Pope Francis as "Person of the year". They're a secular magazine, he has been newsworthy, and his main competition was Miley Cyrus. But, it's surprising that the "Advocate" - a sodomite publication, would bestow on him the same honor. After all, the Catholic Church is still officially opposed to sodomy and queer marriage. Maybe they like the dresses he wears?

I suspect this is really a shout-out to the previous Pope, Benedict. When he was Cardinal Josef Ratzinger, he was in charge of the Vatican agency responsible for prosecuting the homo-pedophile priests. IOW, he covered-up for them. When charges were about to be filed against him for it, he was named Pope. With that making him a national leader, he acquired diplomatic immunity.

Now that some years have passed and the coast is clear (unlikely anyone would prosecute a former Pope), he was able to resign his office. He still must stay in the Vatican, though, to be secure from potential prosecution.

DUCK!

*

All the Duck man said was that men prefer women's natural plumbing to a man's keester. At least 97% of the men in America agree. So why was that statement even controversial?

The fact that it was controversial is the problem. The queer 3% have such total control of our media and political clout that they can make it look like there is some problem with what he said.

THREE WAY SLIPPERY SLOPE

*

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/12/16/North-Dakota-Allows-Man-In-Same-Sex-Marriage-To-Also-Marry-Woman

North Dakota to Let Man in Same-Sex Marriage Wed Woman, Too

TG: Perverts can marry a man in one state, a woman in another. 

But, the tolerant, loving, honest queers told us that queer marriage was not a slippery slope to polygamy, incest, bestiality, or pedophilia. How can this be happening?

SOCHI OLYMPIC INTOLERANT BIGOTS

*

http://espn.go.com/olympics/story/_/id/10154712/president-barack-obama-selects-gay-athletes-sochi-delegation

 

 

Queer athletes to represent U.S.

 

TG: Despite Russia being anti-queer, Obama and queers insist on cramming their perversion down the throats of the entire world.

POLYGAMY SLIPPERY SLOPE

*

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/12/14/21903224-federal-judge-strikes-down-key-parts-of-utahs-polygamy-law-in-sister-wives-ruling?lite

Federal judge strikes down key parts of Utah's polygamy law in 'Sister Wives' ruling

 

TG: I thought the queers assured us there was no slippery slope following the acceptance of queer marriage? Did they LIE? Or were they truly that stupid?