WISCONSIN MARRIAGE DEFENDERS

The chronicles of the Wisconsin Marriage Defenders of Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Thursday, September 14, 2006

A RESULT of HOMOSEXUAL "MARRIAGE"

*
The logical outcome of allowing same-sex couples to declare they are married to receive benefits is that single people, who are left out of the benefits, wil simply hook up with a "partner", and claim a "marriage" in order to qualify for the benefits. Who can blame them for wanting to get on the wagon instead of pulling it?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/09/13/nsisters13.xml

Treat us like lesbians, say sisters in tax fight

Here we have two octegenarian sisters, who have spent years taking care of elderly family members. Now they care for each other, but when one of them dies, the other will be saddled with an exorbitant inheritance tax because they are not lesbians.

"I don't have the status of a lesbian," Joyce Burden said before the hearing in Strasbourg. "This is an insult to single people who have looked after elderly parents. I don't call that justice."

Richard Hogwood, from Speechly Bircham said: "The trouble with exempting cohabiting siblings from inheritance tax is where to draw the line. How long do they have to cohabit for? What about step-siblings, or half siblings?

That's just it - homosexual couples want to erase the lines and make a mockery of the institution of marriage. This is an example of how that will occur.

7 Comments:

  • At 11:24 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    What a great argument for universal health care! I agree; health care benefits shoudn't be tied to employment.

     
  • At 11:59 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Once again you are sadly misinformed. Universal Health Care would cost no more than we're paying now, would not raise taxes, and would probably save money. Since paying for another's health care would be "stealing", be sure to refuse to accept any Medicare payments when you become qualified. I'm sure you wouldn't want to steal from anyone by acepting those payments.

     
  • At 4:20 PM, Blogger Jared and Beka said…

    "would not raise taxes"

    Yeah, having government run health care wouldn't cost anymore. Just like government run schools don't cost any taxes either. Good rational thought there.

     
  • At 4:56 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    It would cost ME more than I'm pating now, because I'd have to pay for YOUR self-inflicted AIDS and other STDs. That's the whole point. The sodomites want to force the rest of us to bankroll what they bring on themselves with their unhealthy, perverted, unnatural, death and disease ridden behavior.

    I HAVE turned down gov't assistance in the past. I have paid into some programs, so it would not be stealing to get my own money back. It would be better if they didn't take my money in the first place.

     
  • At 8:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    The funny thing is, I'll bet none of you people actually know any homosexuals.

     
  • At 7:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I've done my part.

    You're going to have to reread your blog comments back to the time Al Gore invented the Internet.

    What a dope, trying to kill the homo within! Just can't be done guy, no matter how many leaflets you pass out or comments you delete.

    Silly Rabbit! LOL

     
  • At 9:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    he knows me (smile) don't you tg?

     

Post a Comment

<< Home