WHO'S YOUR DADDY? WHO'S YOUR MOMMY?

*

LESBO MOM HAS SECOND THOUGHTS

http://www.myfoxcleveland.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=2764354&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.3.1

Lesbian Sara Wheeler once campaigned for her partner-in-perversion, Missy, to be able to legally adopt the son Sara conceived through artificial insemination (of course lesbians cannot have their own children).

But now Sara and Missy are no longer together and Sara sees things differently concerning her biological son. Now she doesn't want her ex-wife (?) to have any custody of her son, since she isn't a natural parent of him.

Sara is also having second thoughts about her sexuality, which refutes the idea that queers have no choice because they are born that way.

This is more of the confusion that results from homosexual "marriage".

FAIR(Y) WISCONSIN - 150 TIME LIARS

*

One of the things the pro-queer side kept on claiming during the same-sex marriage battle was that if the bill passed, corporations would not be allowed to give "marriage" benefits to "domestic partners".

Since the successful passage of the Amendment, Fair(y) Wisconsin has proven themselves liars at the following link:

http://www.fairwisconsin.com/DPB/WIemployers.html

On this link they list more than 150 Wisconsin companies who allow "domestic partner" benefits, even for homosexual partners. We thank the fine fellows at Fair(y) Wisconsin for their fabulous work in exposing themselves as deceivers.

Notice something in common between these particular companies that allow benefits for sodomite partners?

Capital Newspapers - south central Wisconsin

The Daily News (Pulitzer, Inc.) - Rhinelander

The Daily Tribune (Gannett Co.) - Wisconsin Rapids

Green Bay Press-Gazette (Gannett Co.) - Green Bay

Herald Times Reporter (Gannett Co.) - Manitowoc

Marshfield News Herald (Gannett Co.) - Marshfield

MBI Publishing - Osceola

Oshkosh Northwestern (Gannett Co.) - Oshkosh

The Post-Crescent (Gannett Co.) - Appleton

The Reporter - Fond du Lac

The Sheboygan Press - Sheboygan

Stevens Point Journal - Stevens Point

Wausau Daily Herald - Wausau

WFRV-TV - Green Bay

WISN-TV - Milwaukee

WITI-TV - Milwaukee

WORT 89.9 FM, Back Porch Radio Broadcasting, Inc. - Madison

Look at all the pro-queer MEDIA in Wisconsin! What a SURPRISE!

One WHAT, one WHAT?!

*
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=581697


Here are a few more details on the newlyweds (yes, the judge allowed them to marry):


The young Aussie girl who married the old male trannie, after knowing him for less than a month, was a lesbian herself. So the guy is probably going to undergo a sex change to become a woman so he can be a co-lesbo with her.


On the original license application, the guy, out of habit, filled out the bride's portion and had to redo it. The Aussie said she'd be glad to have filled out the groom's portion. That tells us who the dominant dyke is in the relationship.


I guess it'll be a good thing if he gets his sex change, because we sure don't want that couple to have any kids.


What will the guy do if the Aussie dyke decides to have her own sex change and become a man? Will he request an annulment?


It is obvious to anyone with the sanity of a Cabbage Patch doll that homosexuality, and related issues, are nothing but confusion. Homosexuality, under whatever perverted guise, is NOT normal.

Here Come the BRIDES?

*
One man one WHAT?


Here's the next attempt to circumvent one-man, one-woman marriage, as we have mandated by law in Wisconsin. They are going to redefine what a man or woman is. Then someone can claim they are really a (fill in the blank) on the inside.




This person was born male, later started living as a female, and now wants to get married as a male. I guess we gotta root for him to get married as a man, the way he was born. Actually, the one-man, one-woman law should not be being challenged by this situation. It shouldn't prevent him from marrying as a man, it should prevent him from marrying as a woman. It's the converse situation, where someone wants to marry as the opposite sex they were born, that would violate our marriage law.



This case is particularly dangerous because our side stands to lose either way, because either way they could be giving man or woman a new definition, or could open the door to doing do in the future.




http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=580965




Is there a groom in the room?


Transgendered past calls wedding's legality into question


By DERRICK NUNNALLY March 21, 2007

If Barbara Lynn Terry wants to get married Friday morning, she'll have to swear to a judge she's a man. And so will her doctor. Otherwise, Wisconsin's same-sex marriage prohibition will keep Terry - who was born a man, lived as a woman for decades and has undergone treatment for sexual-reassignment surgery - from marrying Nicole Winstanley, despite the marriage license application the couple completed March 5.

...

New York Law School professor Arthur S. Leonard, an expert in sexual-orientation law, said it would take "an unusual decision" to prohibit the Terry-Winstanley marriage. In the handful of other states where the issue has been litigated, courts have taken the side that one's birth gender is the legal gender for the purpose of marriage, Leonard said.

PUBLIC PERVERSION

*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrzaf_Msot8&eurl=

This is a link to a video of a "gay" parade in Dallas, Texas sponsored by Southwest Airlines. This shows what the queer perverts do in PUBLIC, out in the open, in front of everybody. Not only that, it was a rainy day, they probably would've been worse if it had been clear and sunny.

THIS is why we are involved in this battle. THEY are bringing it to us, shoving it in our faces. If they kept their perversion private, we wouldn't bother tham (it would be unconstitutionl, in fact).

They want to prance in public and flaunt their perversion openly. They don't just want equal rights.

A new "hate crimes" bill further protecting homosexual activity has been introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives. The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act would increase protection for the kind of activity shown on this video.

The bill is a step toward silencing opposition to the homosexual deathstyle. If this "hate crimes" bill is passed, and you publicly protest, complain, or oppose the type of activity in this video, your action could be prosecuted as a criminal act.

The homosexuals want the right to show obscene things such as men with breasts, men sporting erections at the sight of other men, and various examples of prancing fairies, but they don't want anyone else to even have free speech to criticize their perverted public behavior.

QUEER KILLER CANNIBALS

*

I thought the story about sodomite severers was a bit extreme, but after doing a quick Google search for "homosexual cannibals" I found that this behavior was more rampant than I realized. Sodomite castration is almost mild in comparison to queer cannabilism. Here are a few of the entries:

*

Homosexual Cannibal Admits To Eating Victim
Reuters reports on December 3, that Armin Meiwes has admitted in a German court that he killed and ate

*

German Joys: Cannibal Crosses the Atlantic
An American student of Criminal Psychology living in Germany, [who] becomes obsessed with her research subject Oliver Hartwin, a homosexual cannibal killer

*

The Austin Chronicle: Reader Comments: Keep the River On Your ...
Tobias Schneebaum is an 80-year-old Jewish homosexual cannibal from New York City --

*

Dahmer most famous homosexual serial killer & cannibal the Crime ...
Bizarre young man evolves into a weird homosexual serial killer who tortures his young minority victims, kills and mutilates them and even eats parts of

*

Mailgate: bit.listserv.gaynet: A WORD FROM OUR ENEMIES: The ...
"Will HBO or NBC do movies on 10-year-old Zachary Ramsay who was kidnapped, murdered, and apparently eaten by homosexual cannibal and serial killer Nathan Bar-Jonah?

*

Songun Blog: Home Is Where Dear Leader Is
Why does the unknown "US progressive radical left-wing atheist polygamist homosexual cannibal socialist dissident pot-smoking mass murderer Dr. Peter K. Fallon

*

Knowhere: Glenrothes, Fife, Local Heroes, Famous Residents
Mass murderer and homosexual cannibal Dennis Nielsen lived in Glenrothes for a while.

*

Cannibalism
21-May-1960, 28-Nov-1994, Homosexual serial killer cannibal. Nikolai Dzhurmongaliev ... Criminal. 19-May-1870, 16-Jan-1936, Serial killer and cannibal

*

Perhaps some of these examples are false accusations or spoofs, but I only checked five of the 80 PAGES (799 entries) Google flagged.

*

Also notice that 46 of the world's worst multiple murderers and serial killers were homosexuals: http://www.adherents.com/misc/hsk.html

The END of PERVERSION

*

http://www.crimelibrary.com/news/original/0406/0501_dungeon_castration.html http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/16/ap/strange/main2579408.shtml

Sodomites Sentenced for Severing Six Sick Sex Slaves

Here is what happens when perversion is allowed to fester.

Two queers and their "slave" were recently convicted for their involvement in castrations of six men solicited via the internet to be their "sex slaves".

The judge commented:

"I think this is a type of perversion that cannot be tolerated by society," Winner said during a sentencing hearing Thursday.

Why how judgmental! He called their actions "perversion"!

Of course the lavendar lobby will insist only the castrations were acts of perversion, not the acts of homosexual activity. That excuse doesn't hold water. It was a bunch of men getting together as "sex slaves" to perform perverted acts with their sex organs. Perversion begets perversion.

These were not your typical homosexuals who average two different partners a week (over 100 different men every year). These were the kind of homosexuals the lavendar lobby usually parades in public because they had a long-term (20+ year) relationship. These were among the more conservative and moral homosexuals. One can only wonder what kinds of things the real reprobate ones are up to.

This is the kind of perverted behavior homosexual sodomy begets. Last year some cases were reported of homosexuals entering suicidal cannibal pacts with fellow perverts where they agreed to have their sordid acts culminated by being KILLED and EATEN by their "lovers" (oh what love!). This was uncovered when one of the queers got cold feet and reneged on his death pact and went to the police.

People who are going away from God will go further and further, just as we see in these examples.

QUEERS AFTER KIDS? SHHHH!

*

Those tolerant queers have no interest in children. That's what they repeatedly tell us. And they certainly wouldn't be deceptive or against free speech. But WND has exposed where the homos wanted access to children and wanted to keep it secret from everybody, including their parents.

SHHH! SHHHH! HUSH! HUSH! QUIET! They don't want anybody to know they're privately indoctrinating our CHILDREN.

http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54683

BRAVE NEW SCHOOLS

District gags 14-year-olds after 'gay' indoctrination

'Confidentiality' promise requires students 'not to tell their parents'

March 13, 2007 By Bob Unruh © 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Officials at Deerfield High School in Deerfield, Ill., have ordered their 14-year-old freshman class into a "gay" indoctrination seminar, after having them sign a confidentiality agreement promising not to tell their parents.

"This is unbelievable," said Matt Barber, policy director for cultural issues for Concerned Women for America. "It's not enough that students at Deerfield High are being exposed to improper and offensive material relative to unhealthy and high-risk homosexual behavior, but they've essentially been told by teachers to lie to their parents about it."

"NORMAL" SODOMITE BEHAVIOR

*

THE TRUTH ABOUT "NORMAL" SODOMITE BEHAVIOR

by Al Doyle

Don't expect the local homosexual activist to publicly describe what goes on this alleged "alternate lifestyle". Likewise, opponents of the sodomite propaganda movement may not have much to say - but for entirely different reasons.

For starters, the mainstream media is blatantly biased to the point of clumsiness in favor of the shrill, pro-homo minority. (TG: The Oshkosh Northwestern leads the way as a pro-homo mouthpiece.) There's nothing subtle about their agenda, which includes Soviet-style censorship of the other side (TG: The Northworstern banned me from their online forums without reason, and won't print my letters to the editor.). Opponents of perversion are also limited by Federal Communications Commission obscenity rules (on radio and TV) plus various print media guidelines for what is considered allowable.

To describe popular homosexual practices in even the most general or bland terms often isn't permissible. Part of that is because of media bias, but there is also some concern for what could be heard or read by children. (The Northworstern refused to print a description of homosexual practices. That fact alone demonstrates how vile and perverted those acts are - but the Northworstern supported them anyway.)

Newspapers and other cheerleaders for homosexuality often exploit this sincere desire to protect the young by banning even the smallest exposure of the sodomite culture. They hypocritically invoke the "It's for the children" mantra while fervently promoting the idea of brainwashing grade schoolers that "gay is O.K."

Naturally, that's quite a handicap for those who seek to get the truth out. Allow me to make an attempt to break the blockade by describing two popular homosexual practices.

The utter depravity of sodomy makes the task difficult. I'll keep it completely free of obscenity and as simple and mild as possible.

The slang term "golden showers" means nothing to the average person, but it's a big deal in the narcisstic world of homosexuality. Those who engage in this vile activity either urinate on their countless "partners" or are on the receiving end of such treatment. (TG: I can't imagine what kind of physical pleasure, even perverted, can be derived from this unsanitary practice.)

Then there's "fisting". As might be expected, a clenched fist is involved here. The fist is shoved as far as possible up the anal cavity of a fellow homosexual. Doesn't that sound like it fits the "loving" label that sodomites constantly bestow on themselves? Fisting has resulted in serious and permanent physical damage for countless persons, but that hasn't kept homos from engaging in such practices.

Many other perverted activities (including sadomasochism and pedophilia) can easily be found in homosexual circles. It would take several books to fully cover the topic, and who wants to be so immersed in such filth? Just remember that the 21st century descendants of ancient Sodom would gladly do such things to your sons if they have the opportunity.

INCEST IS NEXT?

*

I've been claiming that the polygamists would be the next group to piggyback the homosexual trail in attempting to get special rights for an aberrant behavior, but I may be wrong about that. An incestuous brother and sister are fighting for marriage rights in Germany. They might get their perversion legallized before the polygamists.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6424937.stm

Patrick and Susan have been living together for the last six years, and they now have four children.

Medical research has shown that there is a higher risk of genetic abnormalities when close relatives have a child together. When siblings have children, there is a 50% chance that the child will be disabled.

"Eric, their eldest child, has epilepsy, he also has learning difficulties. Their daughter, Sarah, has special needs.

"We would like society to recognise us, as any other normal couple.", said Patrick.

But they are NOT a normal couple. Neither are polygamists or sodomites.

QUEERS IN THE MILITARY (Continued)

QUEERS IN THE MILITARY

*
http://news.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/dont-ask-dont-tell-revisited/20070228124709990001?ncid=NWS00010000000001

"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Revisited

Vet Fights to End Ban on Openly Gay Service Members

The first U.S. Marine seriously wounded in Iraq , Staff Sgt. Eric Alva, joined with Rep. Marty Meehan, D-Mass., as a bipartisan group of Congress members pushed legislation to overturn the ban on openly gay and lesbian troops serving in the military. The Pentagon has long maintained that the ban is necessary for unit cohesion. "The bottom line for the military is, 'Is this a policy change that's going to help promote combat effectiveness?'" said retired Lt. Col. Robert "Bob" Maginnis. "I see no evidence of that." Alva hopes that he can change minds by arguing the ban is simply unfair to gays and lesbian service members who are already serving their nation honorably, not to mention Americans who want to serve. He and his partner will never be able to live under the same rules and regulations applied to a husband and wife, for instance.

TG: It might not be "fair" to homosexuals. However, having homosexuals shower and bunk with normal people isn't fair to them. It would be no different than having all the men and women shower and bunk together.

Their argument is that straight men have nothing to fear, a homosexual would not be attracted to all of them. So what? He might be attracted to some of them. IF his homosexuality is something he was "born" with and cannot control (which is their claim), then it's more than reasonable to expect he'd be attracted, if not aroused, by showering and bunking with numerous other men.

A heterosexual might not be attracted to all women, but he'd certainly be sexually charged by showering and bunking with numerous females.

The social experimenters are trying to use the military to remove one of the strongest human drives - the sexual desire and drive to reproduce. That drive is as normal in humans as the drive to eat and breath. It's necessary for survival of the human race. The liberal change-agents are not going to change that without destroying the natural order of humanity. They will destroy our military, and ability to protect our country, trying to get their queer agenda foisted on America. They are so selfish in wanting to push their perversion on everybody, they don't care if they destroy America in the process.

Increasingly, advocates for lifting the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" compromise that President Clinton signed into law in 1993 argue that the ban on gays and lesbians serving openly is a national security issue. The military is stretched thin, the argument goes, and the unit cohesion commanders argue is threatened with the presence of "out" soldiers and Marines pales in comparison with the loss of specialists.

Did they ever stop to think that maybe allowing stealth sodomites in the military is keeping many straights out who could be filling those roles?

Maginnis says that the military has "come to the conclusion that if we embrace homosexuality openly in the military than that has far more of a detrimental impact than will keeping someone just because they happen to have a critical skill."

Again, they don't just want to be left alone to practice their alternate sexual proclivities, they want to force everyone else to"embrace" their perversion. They are intolerant bigots.

THE FUTURE IS HERE AND NOW

*
We have made several predictions relating to the queer marriage agenda, and they are virtually all coming to pass right before our eyes.

We said the queers were not simply after the right to practice homosexual perversion in private, they want to expand to supporting open sodomy, polygamy, pornography, pedophilia, and other vile practices.

We've already seem testimony by polyamorists and polygamists that they are following the patter set by the homosexuals to have their vices foisted upon society.

One other major thing we predicted was that homosexual marriage would make a mockery of marriage and that all kinds of people will "marry" to get benefits. That is already happening, even before homosexual marriage is actually legalized. See the article at: http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/connecticut/ny-bc-ct--adultadoption0225feb25%2C0%2C5186702.story?coll=ny-region-apconnecticut

A lesbian lady adopted her older "lover" as her child so she could qualify for certain benefits. Never mind that she could've put her in her will to get the same benefits. That action wouldn't make a travesty of marriage like the course of action they are taking.

If the gov't forces employers to offer benefits to "partners" rather than just to spouses. virtually everybody will sign up as someone's "partner" in order to get the bennies. This would be a devastating expense for businesses which would be offset by higher prices, lower wages, firing workers, or closing down.

Not only that, it will make marriage a farce. That's their goal. Everyone will be involved in some kind of "marriage" for the sake of benefits. There will be nothing special in society about an actual marriage.