OFF EASY - IF QUEER

***

TWO sodomite child rapists get off but a straight man in a consenting affair faces 150 years.

SEXTRA CREDIT
WorldNetDaily
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48402
Again! Homosexual teacher gets no jail for teen assault
Choir instructor at Wisconsin school is 2nd case this week without prison

--WND WorldNetDaily
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48397
Judge: No prison time for 'gay' rapist teacher
On heels of Vermont outrage, predator gets only probation

--WND
http://www.wbay.com/Global/story.asp?S=4379893
Man faces 150 years for alleged sex with girls
Prosecutors say teacher had 10-month relationship with 14-year-old --WBAY-TV, Green Bay

Apparently the moral of the story is that if you're going to molest children, you're better off being a homosexual. You'll have a better chance to get away with the crime against nature (in this life). It could also be that proportionally more child molesters are homosexual, and that's why more of them get off. Either alternative is disgusting.

NWern EDITOR PROTECTS QUEER KAUL

***

Before anyone gets offended, QUEER is a totally appropriate word to use for Mike Kaul, the leader of the Oshkosh sodomite group "QUEERS on the WATER". If he calls himself queer, I can sure use his own term.

In one of the greatest hissy fits in history, Macho Mike Kaul publicly declared that he and other sodomites are absolutely opposed to pedophilia and bestiality. It must have pained him to publicly proclaim that lie in the Northworstern. A lie because many of his comrades don't share his "morality" when it comes to incest, pedophilia, and bestiality. Proven a lie in the very letter he is responding to, which cited the "Gay Rights Platform", supported by 85 homosexual advocacy groups and proved that THEY wanted prostitution, incest, and pedophilia. Mike has no right speaking for any queer except himself.

It's beyond the need for documentation that the majority of pedophilia is men-on-boys. They even have an organization called "North American Man-Boy Love Ass'n". 100% of the man-boy pedophiles are homosexual.

It's four homosexual activists in Massachusetts who are sponsoring legislation to decriminalize bestiality. Is that just an incredible coincidence?

But the Executive Editor of the Northworstern, Stew Reickman, rescues the sodomites AGAIN, giving Macho Mike the last word and protecting him from rebuttal:

"Editor's note: This will be the last letter on the gay marriage/civil union referendum for this go around."

In this "go around" we saw at least five pro-homo replies to every letter critical of homosexual "marriage". Dick Ives letter alone received at least 11 responses.

Oshkosh may be more of a homo-haven than we thought, but it still doesn't have FIVE times more queers than straights - but you would think it does judging by the letters in the Northworstern.

My whole idea was to set it up so some queer would finally do what Kaul just did. I offered the same challenge to homosexual State Senator Tim Carpenter, and he refused to take it up in person, or by email.

My next move was intended to expose the hypocritical homos for claiming they support the right of "consenting adults" who "love each other" to marry. No they don't. They parrot the line and apply it to their perversion, but Kaul just admitted he doesn't support incest. He is an intolerant bigot, as well as a hypocrite. He supports the legalization of HIS vice, but he is intolerant of the vices he allegedly doesn't practice.

If a brother and sister, or a brother and brother, or a father and daughter LOVE each other, why can't they get married? If Kaul wants the right to marry another man, why is he not allowing two men to marry who just happen to be brothers? (Or two women who are sisters). He doesn't want them to have the SAME rights that he wants for himself! He is a selfish purveyor of intolerance and hate. Kaul is an incestophobe and a beastophobe who is filled with hate for those who have those sexual orientations. "Liberty and justice for ALL", Mike.

BTW, Kaul has met me and spoken to me at one of the Oshkosh rallies, though he wouldn't have known my name from that. But he also was at our rally that I moderated, so he should have known my name from that.

Here's his letter:

http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060112/OSH06/601120365/1191/OSHopinion

Gay man accepts challenge to repudiate 'vile practices'

I appreciate the opportunity to set the record straight for Teno Groppi so there are no lingering questions for him and others with similar beliefs. ("Gay advocates should denounce immoral acts," Jan. 8) First and foremost, I have never met Groppi and have never been asked to speak publicly about what he describes as "vile practices." I'm not quite sure if this was an invitation to speak, if so, it was poorly delivered. So let me just reiterate for the public record, I, (or any other homosexual that I have ever had the pleasure of knowing), in any way, shape or form would ever condone incest, pedophilia or bestiality. Most homosexuals, as with most heterosexuals, do not practice any of these behaviors, which are considered abnormal by most morals and standards. I also "repudiate" sex between a father and daughter, a man and a boy, a woman and a dog and any other perverted examples Groppi would like to dream up. Homosexual marriage will not lead to an increase in any of these behaviors in our society because they are already a part of this society. The statistical numbers will not change. As a suggestion maybe Groppi should focus on eliminating these "vile practices" in the heterosexual community before he attacks others. I'll do the same in the homosexual community and when we have our respective communities cleaned up, then we can "rationally" discuss gay marriage.

Michael Kahl Oshkosh

Editor's note: This will be the last letter on the gay marriage/civil union referendum for this go around.

REICKMAN DISTORTS MY LETTER

***

The Oshkosh Northworstern finally printed my letter exposing what the homosexual movement is indeed after (sodomy, prostitution, incest, pedophilia, bestiality) according to their own "Gay Rights Platform". However, Executive Editor Stew Reickman (photo) made some inexcusable "editing" (it is probably libel to call it editing, at the very least it's highly inaccurate and giving Reickman more credit than he deserves).

You can see my full article at http://wismd.blogspot.com/2005/12/letters.html and Reickman's wrestings at http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060108/OSH06/601080394/1191/OSHopinion

There are two things that were particularly egregious. One was the title he gave my letter:

"Gay advocates should denounce immoral acts"

I don't use the word 'gay' to refer to sodomites unless I am quoting something like the "Gay Rights platform" (see "Definitions" at http://wismd.blogspot.com/2005/12/definitions.html). I prefer more accurate terms. However, that was a minor irritant. The problem with this title is that it implies that homosexuality is NOT an immoral act. An honest title would be something like "Homosexual advocates should denounce other immoral acts in addition to sodomy".

The other irresponsible deviation was to change this statement of mine:

"Their Platform has planks calling for the legalization of such abominations as prostitution, incest, and even pedophilia (adult-child sex)!"

That statement is very plain, understandable, and accurate.

Reickman mangled my words and made the claim more confusing and difficult to decipher. I'm convinced that was the intent. Editing usually makes things clearer and shorter, not fuzzier and longer. I'm convinced that Reickman did not want the abominable goals of the sodomites to be so blatantly obvious to readers. Here is the cloudy fog of confusion Stew replaced my words with:

"Their platform has planks calling for (repealing state laws that prohibit private sexual acts involving consenting persons, of all laws governing the age of sexual consent and laws prohibiting prostitution, both male and female)

Who could get through that and know what it was saying? My plain statement left no confusion.

I am wondering what was wrong with my comments (except that they exposed the sodomite lobby more then Stew wanted them exposed)?

Northworstern: "laws prohibiting prostitution, both male and female"
Me: "prostitution"
My way was certainly easier and accurate.

Northworstern: "all laws governing the age of sexual consent "
Me: "pedophilia (adult-child sex)!"
Again, my way is simpler, and the removal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent is certainly to permit pedophilia.

Northworstern: "repealing state laws that prohibit private sexual acts involving consenting persons"
Me: "incest"
Much simpler again, although I'll concede that incest is only one type of sexual act involving consenting persons. I could have included polygamy, polyandry, polyamory, prostitution (again), sodomy, incest (again), adultery, orgies, and other deviances.

The last one is the only one I can see Stew having a legitimate desire to clarify, although it was me who limited it to incest, so it should not have been his concern.

Fortunately, I also wrote the rest of my letter with plain, clear, unmistakable words, so my message got out anyway. Stew could not have edited everything like he did in the above examples and stay out of jail on a libel conviction.

Here is the letter as printed in the Oshkosh Northworstern"

Gay advocates should denounce immoral acts

Homosexual advocate Michael Kahl suggested that we look at the problem of homosexual marriage "rationally".

Despite the fact that the term "homosexual marriage" is an oxymoron that rivals "civil war," "united nations" or "government intelligence," I took up Michael's offer. I looked up the "Gay Rights Platform," which was sponsored by more than 85 homosexual groups and read into the Congressional Record. It's the nearest thing to an official position of the homosexual community.

I was shocked to see that the mainstream homosexual community has no intention of just settling for the right to force society to recognize their relationships as marriages. Their platform has planks calling for (repealing state laws that prohibit private sexual acts involving consenting persons, of all laws governing the age of sexual consent and laws prohibiting prostitution, both male and female)

I then challenged outspoken homosexual State Senator Tim Carpenter (Milwaukee) four times to repudiate those things, and he has smugly refused. Thus far, Kahl has also refused to speak publicly against these vile practices. They shriek in disdain that we dare to point these things out — but they absolutely refuse to actually denounce incest, pedophilia, or even bestiality.

Anyone who cannot openly and publicly repudiate sex between a father and a daughter, or a man and a boy, or a woman and a dog, has no business telling anybody else to behave "rationally."

If we allow homosexual marriage, we already know what will be coming next. We need to stop their assault on morality now.

Teno Groppi Oshkosh

HORSEBACK MOUNTAIN NEXT?

***













































***

SLIPPERY SLOPE

...

The "slippery slope" argument is that if we allow for homosexual marriage, we wil have no logical ground for preventing other immorality such as polygamy, incest, necrophilia, pedophilia, bestiality, and rape.

Without the Bible as our authority for right and wrong - anything goes. Society used to think abortion and sodomy were wrong, now they use our taxes to pay to promote those "alternate lifestyles" and "choices". Someday, perhaps sooner than we think, the same will apply to pedophilia (it already is to some degree), bestiality (they are trying in Massachusetts), and even rape (see below). What was considered wrong will be considered okay, if not preferred and protected.

For years I've claimed that rape will one day be considered an alternate "sexual orientation" and to prevent someone from practicing his "sexual orientation" would be a violation of his "civil rights".

This is one prediction I did not really expect to come true anytime soon, but it was a very effective argument against situational ethics, humanistic morality, or having anything but an absolute Bible as the final authority for right and wrong.

But it's getting closer than even I thought. Now we have courts contending for "bondage and discipline, domination and submission, sadism and masochism” (BDSM), which is very close to rape.

Brash homosexual Sen. Tim Carpenter mocked me for making the "slippery slope" argument at the Congressional hearing. But we can see ther slope is indeed more slippery than we thought.

http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/jan/06010510.html

Sado-Masochism Might be ‘Sexual Orientation’ says BC Human Rights Tribunal

By Hilary WhiteVANCOUVER, January 5, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) -

The BC Human Rights Tribunal is being asked to discover a new “sexual orientation.” The Vancouver Sun reported December 30, that a self-described “pagan” is accusing the Vancouver police of discrimination for refusing him a license to drive a limousine because of his involvement in the “bondage and discipline, domination and submission, sadism and masochism” (BDSM) underworld.

A Vancouver man, Peter Hayes, has accused the Vancouver police of illegal discrimination because of his involvement in BDSM. Hayes says that he lost a potential job as a limousine driver when police refused him a chauffeur's permit and has taken his case to the Human Rights Tribunal.

The Tribunal’s Lindsay M. Lyster wrote an 18 page preliminary decision saying that the complaint can go forward. She said that while she did not completely understand the “precise nature of Mr. Hayes' lifestyle, practices and preferences,” they ought to be investigated as to whether they fall under the definition of sexual orientation, and therefore of the protection of human rights legislation.

Lyster wrote that she did not understand the meaning “of the parties' use of the term BDSM or other related terms.” Despite this, she believed “that Mr. Hayes suffered an adverse impact as a result of the respondents' actions is, on the facts alleged, clear, as he was denied a chauffeur's permit and lost the opportunity to work.”

The police department said, “In our submission, sexual orientation is separate and distinct from preferences or behaviours while engaging in sex. The legislature has not gone so far as to prohibit discrimination on the basis of preferences or behaviour.”

The issue of legal protection for “sexual orientation,” however, is a vexed one since when such legislation was introduced, a clear definition was deliberately withheld.

Gwen Landolt, a family advocate and head of Real Women of Canada, told LifeSiteNews.com that no definition of the term can be found in Canadian law so it can and is used to provide legal protection to any sexual proclivity.

Landolt said, “That was the whole point when the legislation began to appear. ‘Orientation’ was left open so as to include pedophilia, bestiality or anything anyone wants.”

“This has been the goal of the homosexual movement from the start: to remove from the Canadian criminal code everything pertaining to sexual morality, and their favorite method is to use the Human Rights Tribunals. These tribunals are not run according to the standards of evidence and due process as the normal courts,” Landolt said.

Lyster wrote that the Tribunal should employ the opinion of “experts” to decide if Mr. Hayes’ sexual interests could be considered an “orientation.” Given the willingness of experts to approve of most sexual activities that had heretofore been considered sick or dangerous to past generations, it seems to Landolt that one more sexual deviation is about to be given legal protection in Canada.

Landolt said, “The same thing happened in Ontario with the so-called ‘transgendered.’ They were refused OHIP coverage for their surgeries and they went to the Human Rights Tribunals. Now we have seen it with the swinger’s clubs in Montreal, and previously with child pornography. You name it.”

(c) Copyright: LifeSiteNews.com is a production of Interim Publishing. Permission to republish is granted (with limitation*) but acknowledgement of source is *REQUIRED* (use LifeSiteNews.com).

WI DEFENDS PEDOPHILES?

***

It shocked me to see this website advertising to protect pedophiles in Wisconsin. Although anyone accused of a crime has the right to defend themselves, it's disconcerting to see more concern being given to the pedophile perpetrator than the victim!

http://www.defend-me.com/Wisconsin/pedophilia.asp

Wisconsin PEDOPHILIA

Criminal Defense Attorney

Have you been charged with Pedophilia in Wisconsin? Have your rights in Wisconsin been violated? Have you been falsely accused? We can help.

Contact Us immediately for a FREE case evaluation and answers to your questions Find out if you have a case in Wisconsin and what to do if you do.

Wisconsin Pedophilia: The act or fantasy on the part of an adult of engaging in sexual activity with a child or children. Pedophilia is a crime that may carry a lasting social stigma and serious legal consequences. In some states, because of overwhelming pressure from the public, many prosecutors will stop at nothing to gain a conviction in these cases. And the potential punishment for a conviction can be quite severe. In part because of Megan's Law, a Wisconsin Molestation conviction could mean that you must register as a sex offender everywhere you go for the rest of your life.

Wisconsin Penal Code

Did You Know?

90% of the rapes and sex crimes of children less than 12 years old knew the offender, according to police-recorded incident data.

Convicted rape and sexual assault offenders report that 2/3rd of their victims were under the age of 18.

State felony court convictions, the FBI's UCR arrests and National Crime Victimization Surveys all point to sex offenders being older than other violent offenders, generally in the early 30's.