GANG BANG!?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/2083216/Four-better-or-four-worse-for-marriage-of-four.html
Four better or four worse for marriage of four
A Californian family has unveiled the latest version of family life - a marriage of four.
If queer parents are okay because two parents are better than one, why wouldn't four parents be better?
Here one married woman got pregnant from another married man (they were sharing the same tent on a camping trip). Then the two wives got a lesbo thing going, so all four moved in together. They all took the same last name and registered as equal guardians to their children (probably because they don't know which children are whose - some even belong to outsiders).
The optimum is ONE father and ONE mother. That's the way God designed it, that's the way nature works.
If we allow homosexuals to call their relationships "marriage", why wouldn't arrangements like this have as much claim to call their relationships marriages?
Once you breach the principle anything is allowed.
Four better or four worse for marriage of four
A Californian family has unveiled the latest version of family life - a marriage of four.
If queer parents are okay because two parents are better than one, why wouldn't four parents be better?
Here one married woman got pregnant from another married man (they were sharing the same tent on a camping trip). Then the two wives got a lesbo thing going, so all four moved in together. They all took the same last name and registered as equal guardians to their children (probably because they don't know which children are whose - some even belong to outsiders).
The optimum is ONE father and ONE mother. That's the way God designed it, that's the way nature works.
If we allow homosexuals to call their relationships "marriage", why wouldn't arrangements like this have as much claim to call their relationships marriages?
Once you breach the principle anything is allowed.
posted by T.G. @ 2:16 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home