SODOMITE SUPPORTER STEW STRIKES AGAIN!

*

Executive Editor of the Oshkosh Northwestern (AKA NorthWORSTern), Stewart Rieckman (AKA Reek-man) insists he is fair and unbiased. One again he shows that claim is not true.

In an article bemoaning the lack of "moderate Republicans", Stewie connected protecting private property with protecting sodomite marriage.

http://thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060305/OSH07/603050390/1193/OSHnews

Early in the conversation, Wood justified amending the constitution to include revenue caps by saying the purpose of the constitution is to "define and limit state government."

It sounded too well-rehearsed and scripted. So I pressed him. "If that's true, how do you justify a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriages and civil unions?"

Stewie apparently is unaware that private property is a Constitutionally protected right whereas sodomite marriage is not. One would think an executive editor would know that distinction. Then again, this same editor thinks there are not enough moderate Republicans.

The fact is almost all Republicans today are moderate, if not liberal. If they were truly conservative, abortion would be illegal, the right to carry guns would be uninfringed, gov't spending (and thereby taxes) would be cut by about 75%.

But that's not the worst of it. Stewie's column was feted by the cowardly queer lobby site Fair(y) Wisconsin!

http://www.fairwisconsin.com/news/index.html

See the 3-5 entry.

FAIR(Y) WISCONSIN ARE INTOLERANT SISSIES!

*





















Yesterday on the pro-sodomite blog, Fair(y) Wisconsin (http://noontheamendment.blogspot.com/), our own 'Oshkosh Al" asked a simple, basic question. He asked them to describe the common homosexual acts so people would be familiar with what they are.

Someone responded but did not answer Al's questions, so I answered them for him.

Somehow that answer got lost in cyberspace and the entire thread disappeared! I assume it wasn't censored purposely, since the sodomites are all are about truth and tolerance, aren't they? The queers wouldn't hide facts and truth, would they?

These answers are from the Kinsey report, so they can't accuse us of anti-gay bias, since he was one of them.

BEWARE! Although clinical terms are used, the description of what homosexuals do is graphic and repugnant. Exercise descretion if you read further. We are not even dealing with the extreme stuff done by the lunatic fringe, these are the COMMON things done by homosexuals. You will have no trouble understanding why sodomites don't want normal citizens to be aware of these things.

ORAL SEX: Homosexuals fellate almost all of their sexual contacts (and ingest semen from about half of these). Semen contains many of the germs carried in the blood. Because of this, gays who practice oral sex verge on consuming raw human blood, with all its medical risks. Since the penis often has tiny lesions (and often will have been in unsanitary places such as a rectum), individuals so involved may become infected with hepatitis A or gonorrhea (and even HIV and hepatitis B). Since many contacts occur between strangers (70% of gays estimated that they had had sex only once with over half of their partners), and gays average somewhere between 106 and 1105 different partners/year, the potential for infection is considerable.

RECTAL SEX: Surveys indicate that about 90% of gays have engaged in rectal intercourse, and about two-thirds do it regularly. In a 6-month long study of daily sexual diaries, gays averaged 110 sex partners and 68 rectal encounters a year.

Rectal sex is dangerous. During rectal intercourse the rectum becomes a mixing bowl for 1) saliva and its germs and/or an artificial lubricant, 2) the recipient's own feces, 3) whatever germs, infections or substances the penis has on it, and 4) the seminal fluid of the inserter. Since sperm readily penetrate the rectal wall (which is only one cell thick) causing immunologic damage, and tearing or bruising of the anal wall is very common during anal/penile sex, these substances gain almost direct access to the blood stream. Unlike heterosexual intercourse (in which sperm cannot penetrate the multilayered vagina and no feces are present), rectal intercourse is probably the most sexually efficient way to spread hepatitis B, HIV syphilis and a host of other blood-borne diseases.

Tearing or ripping of the anal wall is especially likely with "fisting," where the hand and arm is inserted into the rectum. It is also common when "toys" are employed (homosexual lingo for objects which are inserted into the rectum - bottles, carrots). The risk of contamination and/or having to wear a colostomy bag from such "sport" is very real. Fisting was apparently so rare in Kinsey's time that he didn't think to talk about it. By 1977, well over a third of gays admitted to doing it. The rectum was not designed to accommodate the fist, and those who do so can find themselves consigned to diapers for life.

FECAL SEX: About 80% of gays admit to licking and/or inserting their tongues into the anus of partners and thus ingesting medically significant amounts of feces. Those who eat or wallow in it are probably at even greater risk. In the diary study, 70% of the gays had engaged in this activity - half regularly over 6 months. Result? -the "annual incidence of hepatitis A in ... homosexual men was 22 percent, whereas no heterosexual men acquired hepatitis A."

Ingestion of human waste is the major route of contracting hepatitis A and the enteric parasites collectively known as the Gay Bowel Syndrome. Consumption of feces has also been implicated in the transmission of typhoid fever, herpes, and cancer. About 10% of gays have eaten or played with [e.g., enemas, wallowing in feces]. The San Francisco Department of Public Health saw 75,000 patients per year, of whom 70 to 80 per cent are homosexual men ... An average of 10 per cent of all patients and asymptomatic contacts reported ... because of positive fecal samples or cultures for amoeba, giardia, and shigella infections were employed as food handlers in public establishments; almost 5 per cent of those with hepatitis A were similarly employed." The U.S. Centers for Disease Control reported that 29% of the hepatitis A cases in Denver, 66% in New York, 50% in San Francisco, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal and 26% in Melbourne in the first six months of 1991 were among gays.

URINE SEX: About 10% of Kinsey's gays reported having engaged in "golden showers" [drinking or being splashed with urine]. In the largest survey of gays ever conducted, 23% admitted to urine-sex. In the largest random survey of gays, 29% reported urine-sex. In a San Francisco study of 655 gays, only 24% claimed to have been monogamous in the past year. Of these monogamous gays, 5% drank urine, 7% practiced "fisting," 33% ingested feces via anal/oral contact, 53% swallowed semen, and 59% received semen in their rectum during the previous month.

http://www.lifeandlibertyministries.com/archives/000101.php

EDITOR STEW HYPOCRITE

*

His name is Rieckman, and that is quite appropriate, because something reeks, man.

The executive editor of the Oshkosh Northwestern (AKA NorthWORSTern) has shown his liberal pro-queer bias once again.

WMD member Al Doyle submitted a letter to the editor on the topic of homosexuality and it was rejected for the most hypocritical of reasons imaginable.

Here is Al's letter:

The truth about homosexual behavior

Homosexual activists who call for same-sex marriage or so-called "civil unions" claim they are no different than monogamous heterosexual couples. Those who object to their agenda are often jeered and labeled as homophobes, morons or Bible thumpers.

So what do these militants and their allies say about their own behavior? S.G. Stolberg of the pro-homosexual New York Times wrote "what remains, even in the AIDS era, a central feature of gay urban life: sex clubs, bathhouses and weekend-long drug parties where men may have intercourse with a dozen partners a night ... As their movement for sexual liberation took hold, gay men changed partners as often as some people changed clothes. But the very behavior favored by them - anal intercourse - was particularly conducive to AIDS."

The popular 1988 book After the Ball by homosexual activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen provides a gritty look at the reality of the homosexual mentality.

On pages 308 to 310, the authors describe how public restrooms at Harvard University and other places were taken over by perverts who repeatedly engaged in nude public homosexual acts. Normal men who innocently entered to use the facilities were propositioned for anonymous sex.

Page 311 provides a guilt-free confession of a homosexual who deliberately and repeatedly rubbed his crotch against the rear end of a trapped 13-year old boy at an overcrowded rock concert. These reports and incidents come from the pro-homosexual side.

If this is what the same-sex marriage crowd freely admits to, then what are they hiding from public view?

Sincerely,
Al Doyle

Here is Rieckman's rejection notice:

Dear Mr. Doyle,

After Kirby verified the authorship of the letter, we reviewed the content and determined it was not suitable for a newspaper that is widely distributed in Oshkosh schools and into homes where children have access to it.

Sincerely,
Stewart Rieckman
Executive Editor
Oshkosh Northwestern

Without question Rieckman is withholding the horrendous truth about the actual, admitted activities of the homosexual community. He is censoring them so his readership remains in the dark as to how repugnant homosexuality is.

The things Al mentioned in his letter were what the queers openly admit to, from their own sources. He used clinical terms. He did not use profane or vulgar terms, except for as profane and vulgar (and vile and despicable) as sodomy inherently is. He gave FACTS. Just like when he was confronted by sodomite State Senator Tim Carpenter, who screamed an accusation that Al was guilty of using "EXTREME FACTS".

If they are indeed so terrible that they are unsuitable for publication in the Northworstern, then that is a tacit admission that homosexuality ITSELF is unsuitable for homes, schools, and children. If they won't print Al's letter, it shows that sodomy ITSELF is vile and unmentionable. In which case, the Northworstern has no business allowing homosexual activity or homosexual unions to be promoted on their pages. If the Northworstern had even as much integrity as a steroid shooting professional athlete they would campaign openly AGAINST homosexual activity and homosexual unions, because such are not suitable for homes, schools, and children.

I don't expect the Northworstern, or editor Rieckman, to muster up even that much integrity anytime soon.

WMD on the MAP!

*


http://www.noontheamendment.blogspot.com/2006/02/backers-of-ban-part-2-wisconsin.html

The queers have taken notice of the Wisconsin Marriage Defenders. Joshua Freker, Communications Director of the sodomite group Action WisconSIN, has featured us on his "Fair Wisconsin" blog (or should that be "Fairy Wisconsin"?).

One of the responses was posted by local lesbian, Kay Springstroh.

Kay remarked:

{{ I think that's our man Teno to the right of "John Wayne the Baptist" on the podium. So much for God is Love, apparently. }}

Yes Kay, that IS an exhibition of God's love. According to the Bible you are a lost sinner on your way to hell (as were we all prior to receiving Jesus Christ as Saviour). Not only that, you are living a DEATHstyle that kills most sodomites before age 40. Someone who is silent, or enables, condones, or supports your deadly "choice" and lets you risk killer diseases, early death, and eternal hell doesn't love you at all. They are the worst enemy you could ever have. Those of us who are willing to plainly point out the TRUTH to you are the ones who are concerned with your physical and spiritual well-being, even if you revile us for it.

It is an honor to be receiving publicity from the opposition. It's a confirmation that we are being heard and having an effect.

Here's the original:

1. Fair Wisconsin

Backers of the Ban - Wisconsin Marriage Defenders

http://www.noontheamendment.blogspot.com/2006/02/backers-of-ban-part-2-wisconsin.html

But there are more! This one is from MINNESOTA:

http://lloydletta.blogspot.com/2006/03/blog-for-wisconsin-marriage-defenders.html

2. Blog for the Wisconsin "Marriage Defenders"

They seem more unhinged than Michele Bachmann if that's possible. http://wismd.blogspot.com

Here's their Christmas Eve Post: Why Fight Homosexual Marriage? http://wismd.blogspot.com/2005/12/why-fight-homosexual-marriage.html

They also post the lyrics for a song - Ovedahl is Coming To Town: http://wismd.blogspot.com/2005/12/ovadal-is-coming-to-town.html

Here's another:

http://blockoutwisconsin.blogspot.com/2006/02/arent-these-hateful-people-just-so.html

3. Aren't These Hateful People Just So Precious

TG: We don't hate them, as explained in the first letter and on http://wismd.blogspot.com/2006/03/wmd-on-map.html

Over on Action Wisconsin's blog today, I read an entry about a far-right (and that's being nice) group, the Wisconsin Marriage Defenders (do I hear trumpets blaring?), out of Oshkosh, focused on passing the constitutional amendment to ban marriage, civil unions, and any other generic term recognizing the existence of gay and lesbian couples and their families. Apparently, they have connections to the lovely Ralph Ovadal of the Pilgrims Covenant Church. Sounds sweet, don't it?

This group seems far more interested in the annihilation of gay people rather than solely keeping them from being able to be recognized. In fact, this group is so far out there that they actually have a poem about gay bashing on their blog. Their primary blogger, Teno Groppi, gave this lovely testimony at the joint hearing back in November.

Even more interesting is that at a 2004 rally for that ban, one of the speakers was our illustrious Mark Gundrum (R-New Berlin), the lead Assembly sponsor of the amendment. Also present was Rep. Carol Owens (R-Oshkosh), who is a cosponsor of the ban. I guess they have no problem associating themselves with people who think the next big Hollyood hit is going to be "Horseback Mountain."

They also did a leafleting "outreach" back in December. Here's what they said about their leafleting:

Wisconsin Marriage Defenders has arranged to team up with Pastor Ralph Ovadal to do a literature distribution and picket on 12-17-05. Doing this in the dead of winter will certainly catch the militant homosexuals asleep and unable to mount a counter attack.

With these being the faces of our opposition going into the campaign, things are going to get very, very interesting. posted by David Schowengerdt

And another:

http://folkbum.blogspot.com/2006/02/hate-amendment-coming-soon.html

4. The Hate Amendment, coming soon

TG: Again, we don't hate them, as explained in the first letter and on http://wismd.blogspot.com/2006/03/wmd-on-map.html

I do hope all of you are following the news from the Action Wisconsin team and their No on the Amendment! blog. The Assembly seems poised to vote on the amendment to write the ban on gay marriage into the state Constitution next Tuesday (this would be a good time to call your Assemblyperson).

They also have had a number of interesting articles up profiling real people, and a new series profiling the real scary people, including Channel 30 fixture (Makes Me) Ralph Ovadal and the Wisconsin Marriage Defenders. posted by Jay Bullock

And another:

http://www.pamspaulding.com/weblog/2006/03/snippets-and-blogwhoring.html

Pam's House Blend

An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.

5. Snippets and blogwhoring

* Eva says about Wisconsin Marriage Defenders: "They seem more unhinged than Michele Bachmann if that's possible."

And another:

http://www.eleventh-avenue-south.com/archives/000703.html

6. Wisconsin Winger's Wacky Words

And another:

http://www.wisopinion.com/blogs/2006/02/know-enemy.html

The Xoff Files - http://www.wisopinion.com/blogs/xofffiles.html

7. Know the enemy

Who are the most vociferous backers of a state constitutional ban on gay marriages and civil unions? Meet the Wisconsin Marriage Defenders.

And another:

http://www.waxingamerica.com/2006/03/rightrepublican.html

Paul Soglin: Waxing America

8. How to Kick Wisconsin Right-Wing Butt

So I guess I'd like to know the difference between the Minnesota Citizens in Defense of Marriage or the Wisconsin Marriage Defenders and Fred Phelps of God Hates Fags.

TG: We don't hate them, as explained in the first letter and on http://wismd.blogspot.com/2006/03/wmd-on-map.html

KAHL & STEW DOUBLE-TEAM

*

The last time "gay man" Michael Kahl sent a letter to the Oshkosh Northwestern, the editor, Stew Rieckman, gave him the last word and then nixed the topic (see 1-12 entry).

Somehow the moratorium was lifted and Kahl got another pro-queer letter printed the very next month (see 2-23 entry).

Since writers are only allowed one letter per month, this amounted to giving Kahl two free shots in a row, while censoring all opposition.

Now that the ban has been lifted, my letter is certain to get printed, since Rieckman insists he is fair and unbiased (wink, wink).

I really wanted to write a letter about Dean Zimmerman's "Clergy Letter" mixing evolution and religion (on a gov't website!), but the sodomy matter is more pressing in Wisconsin right now. I didn't expect Kahl to be allowed a letter like this so soon.

Here is my submission:

I never thought the day would come when I'd see a letter by Michael Kahl that I agreed with (2-23-06).

I agree that it's "inappropriate" to have political protests on any issue at funerals (though I disagree that the Fred Phelps group is representative of those opposed to homosexual unions). I also largely agree with his comments that "hate is hate", and that often "hate doesn't come any less tolerable", depending on who is spewing it (although I do believe it is right to hate things that are evil or wrong).

The problem is, in his previous letter (1-12-06), self-professed "gay man" and "Queer on the Water" Kahl proclaimed publicly that he would not "in any way, shape or form would ever condone incest, pedophilia or bestiality".

Why should one alternate sexual orientation (homosexuality) be exempt from intolerance, but the others aren't? Why is it okay for Kahl to be intolerant and hateful if two homosexual men happen to be brothers - and consenting adults? Why does he want laws to protect his sexual preference but not that of pedophiles?

He also referred to "sex between a father and daughter, a man and a boy, a woman and a dog" as "perverted". By what standard does Kahl determine that those are perverted, but men having anal or oral sex with other men is not perverted?

Kahl's tolerance for his own sexual deviation, but intolerance for other "perverted" behaviors highlights the hypocrisy of those trying to justify same-sex marriage. The Bible says that all sexual relations outside of a marriage of one man to one woman is sin. Without God's word, we have no set standard for right and wrong.

2-23-06 http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060223/OSH06/602230376/1191/OSHopinion

1-12-06 http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060112/OSH06/601120365/1191/OSHopinion

I was about to send this to Stew, when I got a call from the Northworstern (only a few minutes after emailing the letter). That usually means they are going to print the letter. So I will cut them some slack and give them some credit. At least he is printing letters from conservatives again. Maybe only one to every five from the opposition, but all truth needs is exposure, and the five falsities fall to defeat.

1-12-06 "Editor's note: This will be the last letter on the gay marriage/civil union referendum for this go around."

It didn't take long to let Michael Kahl violate this edict - his very next letter (2-23-06) dealt with the subject.

Since writers are only allowed one letter per month, this amounted to giving Kahl two free shots in a row, while censoring all opposition.

Now that the ban has been lifted, my letter is certain to get printed, since you insist you are fair and unbiased.

Things like giving the pro-homosexual side the first and last word of each "go around" (that you arbitrarily divide), and a five-to-one ratio of replies in between, certainly give the appearance that you are indeed biased and your bias affects your editing. I wish you would at least do a better job of pretending to be fair if you are going to claim that attribute.

In case you want to claim that Kahl's letter was not dealing with the "gay marriage/civil union referendum", here are a few lines from his letter that prove it is:

{{ then this same body of legislators introduces a bill to ban civil unions and same sex marriage. Hate is hate. }}

{{ The hate ... is just as inappropriate as the introduction of hateful legislation like the constitutional amendment to ban civil unions and gay marriage. }}

{{The hate doesn't come any less tolerable just because it's preached by the legislature while wearing suits instead of ... }}

{{ whom the legislators rallied against }}

{{ next November when they support the discriminatory amendment to our constitution. }}

VICTORY IN WISCONSIN!

Great news!

Thanks to the calls and prayers of citizens all over this state, we succeeded in passing the state constitutional amendment (Senate Joint Resolution 53) preserving One Man-One Woman Marriage. The final vote was 62-31 in favor.

The issue now goes to the voters this November. If approved by a majority of the voters, this Amendment will be placed on our state constitution so activist judges will not be able to creatively reinterpret our constitution to legalize same-sex marriage from the bench, just like the Massachusetts Supreme Court did two years ago.

Thanks again for all your support in this effort. The Amendment, however will need your continued support all through the spring, summer and fall to make sure this succeeds at the statewide referendum this fall.

State Rep. Mark Gundrum

TG: The bill is expected to be passed by the voters easily with a 65% or 70% majority.