WISCONSIN MARRIAGE DEFENDERS

The chronicles of the Wisconsin Marriage Defenders of Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Monday, March 27, 2006

FAIR(Y) WISCONSIN ARE INTOLERANT SISSIES!

*





















Yesterday on the pro-sodomite blog, Fair(y) Wisconsin (http://noontheamendment.blogspot.com/), our own 'Oshkosh Al" asked a simple, basic question. He asked them to describe the common homosexual acts so people would be familiar with what they are.

Someone responded but did not answer Al's questions, so I answered them for him.

Somehow that answer got lost in cyberspace and the entire thread disappeared! I assume it wasn't censored purposely, since the sodomites are all are about truth and tolerance, aren't they? The queers wouldn't hide facts and truth, would they?

These answers are from the Kinsey report, so they can't accuse us of anti-gay bias, since he was one of them.

BEWARE! Although clinical terms are used, the description of what homosexuals do is graphic and repugnant. Exercise descretion if you read further. We are not even dealing with the extreme stuff done by the lunatic fringe, these are the COMMON things done by homosexuals. You will have no trouble understanding why sodomites don't want normal citizens to be aware of these things.

ORAL SEX: Homosexuals fellate almost all of their sexual contacts (and ingest semen from about half of these). Semen contains many of the germs carried in the blood. Because of this, gays who practice oral sex verge on consuming raw human blood, with all its medical risks. Since the penis often has tiny lesions (and often will have been in unsanitary places such as a rectum), individuals so involved may become infected with hepatitis A or gonorrhea (and even HIV and hepatitis B). Since many contacts occur between strangers (70% of gays estimated that they had had sex only once with over half of their partners), and gays average somewhere between 106 and 1105 different partners/year, the potential for infection is considerable.

RECTAL SEX: Surveys indicate that about 90% of gays have engaged in rectal intercourse, and about two-thirds do it regularly. In a 6-month long study of daily sexual diaries, gays averaged 110 sex partners and 68 rectal encounters a year.

Rectal sex is dangerous. During rectal intercourse the rectum becomes a mixing bowl for 1) saliva and its germs and/or an artificial lubricant, 2) the recipient's own feces, 3) whatever germs, infections or substances the penis has on it, and 4) the seminal fluid of the inserter. Since sperm readily penetrate the rectal wall (which is only one cell thick) causing immunologic damage, and tearing or bruising of the anal wall is very common during anal/penile sex, these substances gain almost direct access to the blood stream. Unlike heterosexual intercourse (in which sperm cannot penetrate the multilayered vagina and no feces are present), rectal intercourse is probably the most sexually efficient way to spread hepatitis B, HIV syphilis and a host of other blood-borne diseases.

Tearing or ripping of the anal wall is especially likely with "fisting," where the hand and arm is inserted into the rectum. It is also common when "toys" are employed (homosexual lingo for objects which are inserted into the rectum - bottles, carrots). The risk of contamination and/or having to wear a colostomy bag from such "sport" is very real. Fisting was apparently so rare in Kinsey's time that he didn't think to talk about it. By 1977, well over a third of gays admitted to doing it. The rectum was not designed to accommodate the fist, and those who do so can find themselves consigned to diapers for life.

FECAL SEX: About 80% of gays admit to licking and/or inserting their tongues into the anus of partners and thus ingesting medically significant amounts of feces. Those who eat or wallow in it are probably at even greater risk. In the diary study, 70% of the gays had engaged in this activity - half regularly over 6 months. Result? -the "annual incidence of hepatitis A in ... homosexual men was 22 percent, whereas no heterosexual men acquired hepatitis A."

Ingestion of human waste is the major route of contracting hepatitis A and the enteric parasites collectively known as the Gay Bowel Syndrome. Consumption of feces has also been implicated in the transmission of typhoid fever, herpes, and cancer. About 10% of gays have eaten or played with [e.g., enemas, wallowing in feces]. The San Francisco Department of Public Health saw 75,000 patients per year, of whom 70 to 80 per cent are homosexual men ... An average of 10 per cent of all patients and asymptomatic contacts reported ... because of positive fecal samples or cultures for amoeba, giardia, and shigella infections were employed as food handlers in public establishments; almost 5 per cent of those with hepatitis A were similarly employed." The U.S. Centers for Disease Control reported that 29% of the hepatitis A cases in Denver, 66% in New York, 50% in San Francisco, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal and 26% in Melbourne in the first six months of 1991 were among gays.

URINE SEX: About 10% of Kinsey's gays reported having engaged in "golden showers" [drinking or being splashed with urine]. In the largest survey of gays ever conducted, 23% admitted to urine-sex. In the largest random survey of gays, 29% reported urine-sex. In a San Francisco study of 655 gays, only 24% claimed to have been monogamous in the past year. Of these monogamous gays, 5% drank urine, 7% practiced "fisting," 33% ingested feces via anal/oral contact, 53% swallowed semen, and 59% received semen in their rectum during the previous month.

http://www.lifeandlibertyministries.com/archives/000101.php

16 Comments:

  • At 2:32 PM, Anonymous Billy Zelsnack said…

    Man.. Those "gays" sure get out. 110 sexual encounters a year? All I can say is wow! How do they find the time to do anything else? I mean, they have so many other stereotyped activities to perform. Just amazing.

    btw. All the rage for the christian kids these days is oral and anal sex. After all.. That way they can still be fresh virgins for their loving spouse when they marry. God bless em. Not that any of the good kids at your church would be doing such sinful things. Of course not.

     
  • At 3:59 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    Those numbers are by their own admission, argue with the sodomites, not me.

    Bill Clinton's immoral reign has allowed many to use the excuse that oral sex isn't really sex, and no doubt some Christians take advantage of that excuse as you noted. Nobody here is condoning such behavior.

    We're against all sin, including our own.

     
  • At 6:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

     
  • At 4:38 PM, Anonymous Paul said…

    Somehow that answer got lost in cyberspace and the entire thread disappeared! I assume it wasn't censored purposely, since the sodomites are all are about truth and tolerance, aren't they? The queers wouldn't hide facts and truth, would they?

    As someone so opposed to censorship, I find it interesting that you've been deleting comments off your own blog.

     
  • At 5:03 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    The poster of the deleted comment used a good deal of profanity. If he (or she, it's hard to know since 99% of the pro-sodomy posters are anonymous - just like most of their sexual partners) posts again without the profanity it will not be deleted.

     
  • At 10:05 PM, Anonymous Paul said…

    I don't see how you can call the presumed removal of your posts 'censorship' but then claim that you've censored posts for profanity. What if the fairies or the sodomites or whatever you call them these days (though I prefer people) thought your posts were profane? So now you have the right to decide what is profane on your message board, but when they do the same, you call it censorship? You can't have it both ways.

    Having said that, now I wait for a response full of insults and name-calling.

    Yours, now and forevermore

    Paul

     
  • At 11:22 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    Mr. (or Mrs. or Miss) Anonymous used the 'F' word. If I had the ability to bleep out the curse words and leave the rest, I would have.

    As for them thinking my posts were profane, I asked them twice why my post was removed and they refused to answer.

     
  • At 6:39 PM, Anonymous Paul said…

    I think you're just lying to cover yourself. Otherwise, you could have reposted the comment without the 'F' word. (It only takes a small amount of time to copy and paste the content, removing said offending word. You even could have done it 'anonymously,' and nobody would have known.)

    But it's your blog. You didn't like the post, and you removed it. Do what you will. Censor away. Just don't complain when others do it to you with their blogs. And don't lie about it.

     
  • At 9:10 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    You're burying yourself deeper with every post. If I deleted posts that I didn't like, I'd delete ALL of them. Obviously I didn't delete that post simply because I disagreed with it - I let lots of posts that I disagree with remain. The deleted post was quite short and had virtually no subject matter. All it was was somebody who wanted to cuss.

    No censoring of subject matter is necessary. The pro-sodomite side can't make a point that needs to be censored.

     
  • At 1:42 AM, Anonymous Paul said…

    That still says nothing about why you didn't repost it without the 'F' word, assuming that is all you wanted to censor.

    You shouldn't be the one deciding what has 'virtually no subject matter,' that should be up to the other readers.

     
  • At 6:32 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    It's not my job to repost somebody else's comments. If he wants to repost them without the cursing, that's fine. He won't because there was no substance to the post other than just trying to cuss.

    And it certainly IS me who should be the one to decide, it's my blog.

    I *could* be like the pro-sodomite blogs and censor the truth, but I choose to allow both sides to engage in discussion.

    Had I known you were going to whine so much about it, I would've thought to copy and paste it. The fact that you're making this your main point shows that your position is absolutely berift of facts and logic.

     
  • At 11:25 PM, Anonymous Paul said…

    "And it certainly IS me who should be the one to decide, it's my blog."

    Thanks for making my point. I started with you having no right to complain when others do the same with THEIR blogs.

     
  • At 9:36 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    You're comparing apples with grapefruits. They did not like that my post exposed what sodomy actually is.

    I did not delete an entire thread to avoid the truth, like they did. I've shown more actual tolerance for dissenting views here than any sodomite publication I've ever seen.

    I never said they didn't have the right to control their own blog, only that they were being cowards, liars, and hypocrites by censoring opposing views.

    I have nothing to fear from the pro-queer side posting facts because the facts do not bode well for them. If they did - YOU would be posting some, instead of crying like a baby who can't find its thumb because I deleted the 'F' word.

     
  • At 4:27 PM, Anonymous Paul said…

    And the name calling begins...the best sign of weakness in argument...

     
  • At 5:02 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    Telling the truth is not "name calling". And I don't know what you mean about weakness in argument since you haven't even attempted to make any argument about the homosexual agenda. All you've done is try to create a diversion by whining about me editing a post with the 'F' word.

    I suppose that means you don't even have any weak arguments to make in favor of the sodomite agenda.

     
  • At 11:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I have to agree with billy. I have had the same problem myself.
    You just never know.

    but someone else is but a child here....

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home