The chronicles of the Wisconsin Marriage Defenders of Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Monday, April 17, 2006



Once again, the Oshkosh Northwestern (AKA Northworstern) printed another pro-queer puff piece. That makes about the 6th recent pro-sodomy piece in a row.

WMD member Al Doyle could take no more and called Executive Editor Stew Rieckman (pronounced REEKman) on his overt bias. Here's his letter:

Your bias is showing/note from Al Doyle

I saw Aaron Sherer's commentary on Sunday. I'm not complaining about running opinion pieces from those I don't agree with, as everyone has a right to express their views. It's what happened before Mr. Sherer's commentary that shows a glaring lack of journalistic objectivity on your part.

I'm referring to the multiple puff pieces on Sherer and his "partner" Paul Smith that have appeared in the Northwestern. Those articles weren't news. They were free, pro-homosexual ads. You would be very well qualified to serve as editor for the Soviet-era Pravda. On a more current note, you would also do a superb job as a PR flack for Action Wisconsin.

Don't give me the "It's just a human interest piece" or "They were features" cliches. I have written hundreds of features for different magazines and Sunday travel sections (including some very well-known publications), so I know how that game works. I could think of 50 topics off the top of my head that would be far more popular with your shrinking circulation base than that bit of groveling to the lavender lobby.

You claimed my recent letter quoting homosexuals (along with the New York Times) about their own actions wasn't suitable for young readers. I even enclosed copies of my source materials, so you can't say I made it up. Why do I find it hard to believe your "it's for the children" excuse? You never offered me an opportunity to modify the letter, and I would have worked with you to arrive at a mutually agreeable solution.

If you insist that you or your staff doesn't have a pro-homosexual bias, then you must be some of the laziest reporters to ever populate a newsroom. The truth about sodomy can easily be found with nothing more than a Google search and a trip to the library. Do some basic research.

Here's another tip. Talk to the ER doctors and nurses at big city hospitals in homosexual neighborhoods. Ask them how many bottles and other objects they remove from the rectums of homosexuals each weekend. I guarantee the numbers will be high.

I want a chance to respond to Aaron Sherer. I won't pull any punches, but you won't get any four-letter words. As Sgt. Friday said, it will be "just the facts". Some of the facts won't please Action Wisconsin, but they will be the verifiable truth.

If you think my rant is out of line, remember that the Northwestern is the newspaper that didn't know the difference between a rifle and a shotgun. I have to get my facts straight in every freelance magazine article I write, and I appreciate having to verify the accuracy of what is written. I hope you agree with that standard.


Al Doyle


  • At 7:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    {{{sigh}}} Yet another rant from a sexually repressed paranoid who, since he isn't enjoying his own sex life, makes up ludicrous lies. I can picture this curmudgeon lurking around emergency rooms, salivating, in hopes that he will hear a story about some sex act gone wrong. It' so sad that someone could be so fixated on other people's private sex acts. I wish the editor of that paper would print his article; these kinds of people should be out in the open so kids can be kept away from them. Every Phelps-like lunatic brings more vote against the amendment.

  • At 8:31 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    Care to document any of these supposed "lies"? You can't, because there aren't any.

    We are not at all fixated on other people's private acts - it's the sodomites who have tried to cram their lifestyle down our throats.

    If they just want to practice their perversion in private we wouldn't know about it or care about it. But they are the ones who want to force society to accept their abominable deathstyle. They are the ones who want us to recognize their wretched relations as "marriages".

    If the sodomites keep their "private sex acts" private, we wouldn't be having this dispute.

  • At 5:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    We are not at all fixated on other people's private acts - it's the sodomites who have tried to cram their lifestyle down our throats.

    I only wish they could cram their 'lifestyle' down your throat. [Sigh.]

  • At 5:51 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    That comment shows just how "tolerant", "compassionate", and "loving" the homosexual lobby truly is.

  • At 11:38 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    not all of us are that way and I could think of a million ways so called "religious compassionate god loveing people" have crammed their propoganda of "god loves you" down my throat. it doesnt make sense god and you all contradict yourself!!! I am sick of it!

  • At 11:39 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    If the sodomites keep their "private sex acts" private, we wouldn't be having this dispute.

    It's funny, the only place I have ever heard of "private sex acts" by homosexuals is HERE.

    I wonder why?????

  • At 11:39 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    If the sodomites keep their "private sex acts" private, we wouldn't be having this dispute.

    It's funny, the only place I have ever heard of "private sex acts" by homosexuals is HERE.

    I wonder why?????

  • At 12:43 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    You don't get around much, do you? The homosexual agenda is plastered everywhere. They have websites like Action Wisconsin and Fair(y) Wisconsin. They are pushing for homosexual marriage all over the country. Our local paper, the Oshkosh Northworstern runs a pro-perversion puff piece on about a weekly basis. There's been three more since the love-fest on Aaron Sherer.

    Maybe your problem is you can't read, because if you can, you'd see that the queer agenda is plastered all over the media.

  • At 11:53 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    ohhh! I can't read can I???
    more name calling, got to write that one down!!!

    it's obvious that you do not consider them as human because the latest push for a ban and re definition to be between a man and a woman will deny them many basic human rights. Many hate that because it goes too far. They do not print overt things and just as heterosexual sex is not spoken of so is the homosexual. the only person obsessed with what goes on in their bedroom is YOU.
    THAT is what I meant. You have an unhealthy interest and I wonder why. Maybe you ARE gay like everyone wonders....

  • At 12:28 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    They will be denied no basic right. They have ALL the same rights as heterosexuals. The right to free speech, religious liberty, peaceful redress, right to bear arms, have a speedy trial, etc. including the right to marry someone of the opposte sex.

    Homosexuals want EXTRA rights and special privileges that others do not have.

  • At 11:49 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    ok, but are you against the current legislation? the current legislation beats them down to nothing. I don't consider that special treatment.
    Is things like healthcare a basic right? because they cannot be married, then healthcare becomes even more unbearable than it already is.they have to have seperate plans and what about possible children that they may have? that raises a whole other issue there.

    and we are the most developed country in the world and the sickest, I think even homosexuals should be able to have affordable healthcare. or should they suffer more?

  • At 6:55 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    The legislation doesn't beat anyone down - it doesn't change anything.

    Nothing is a right if you have to take someone else's money for it. You have the right to whatever health care you can get - but you don;t have the right to have me, or a corporation, pay for it.

    Most people have health care as part of a compensation package from their job. Are you saying homosexuals don't have jobs?

    Possible children they might have? You must've flunked biology and anatomy. Sodomites CANNOT reproduce (that's why they recruit and seek positions like teaching, the big brother program, and scout leading).

    We're hardly the sickest country in the world. You lose any credibility with such inane claims.

  • At 11:45 AM, Blogger AngelAiken AKA Thee U.M.O.G said…

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

  • At 11:46 AM, Anonymous the sound of silence said…


  • At 6:05 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    You referred to "possible children that they may have". Adopted children are children somebody ELSE had. Homosexuals CANNOT have their own children.

  • At 11:38 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    ok, ok, I figured you would know what I meant, biologically the children may not be theirs but does that matter?
    ask heterosexual couples that have adopted and you will see that there isn't much of a difference. They are still considered their children, though not biologically

    I think that adoption is great, actually because so many children need to be adopted.

    what about godchildren?

  • At 12:06 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

  • At 12:08 PM, Blogger T.G. said…

    The difference is, heterosexual couples can normally and naturally have their own children (infertile exceptions do not change the fact that naturally and normally this is true). Homosexuals CANNOT EVER naturally and normally have children.

    Heterosexual couples can naturally and normally BE PARENTS. Homosexual couples can NEVER be parents.

    A homosexual couple CANNOT be a *mother* and a *father*. BOTH parents, both performing their particular God-given role, are best for the development of a child.

    Single-parents struggle for similar reasons. A single mother CANNOT be a father to her children. When she tries to be, she is stepping out of her place as a mother.

    Such things may happen out of tragic circumstances like death and divorce, but we should not be encouraging such things by allowing two men or two women to adopt children.

    I shared an apartment with my friend Craig for a few years. I would not have dreamed that we should have been allowed to adopt children (or be covered by each other's health insurance). Yet, you think if two men are committing perverted acts, those perverted acts entitle them to such SPECIAL PRIVILEGES.

    Craig and I were close friends. We did many things together. We were best man at each other's wedding. I loved him like a brother. But we never committed any perverted acts with each other. Somehow, you think the performance of those repulsive acts makes a couple entitled to SPECIAL PRIVILEGES and EXTRA RIGHTS that those of us who do not engage in homosexual sodomy do not have.

    Why do you think the perverted act of homosexual sodomy makes one elgible for extra benefits?

  • At 4:55 PM, Anonymous flipper. remember T? said…



Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home