HATEFUL, INTOLERANT BIGOTS!
*
Earlier this spring was the incredible story of a librarian at Ohio State University at Mansfield who was met with a sexual harassment claim from three professors for simply suggesting that a few conservative books be included on a recommended reading list for incoming freshmen.
These all occurred within the past MONTH:
1. "Anti-Homosexual Bullying 'Endemic' in Schools, Study Says,"
2. "Parents' Suit Challenges Gay-Themed Book,"
3. "Christian Students Considering Lawsuit Over Suspensions,"
4. "California's 'Gay History' Bill Advances,"
5. "Gays Fight Citizens in Court,"
6. "Gay Ice Skaters Settle Hand-holding Harassment Case"
7. "Supreme Court Lets Lesbian Partner Be 'De Facto Parent.'"
8. "Activist Judge Strikes Down Ban On Homosexual Marriage"
1.
The first story claims that 64 percent of homosexual students "reported feeling unsafe at school because of their sexual orientation," according to GLSEN. Queers want laws forbidding "harassment" based on sexual orientation or gender expression. If these statistics are accurate, ordinary school policies against harassment suffice. Homosexuals shouldn't get any special status because of their vile practices.
2.
Two Massachusetts couples have filed a federal lawsuit against school officials because elementary school teachers were giving out and reading storybooks with gay themes without advance notification to parents. What happened to the wall of separation between church and state the liberals are always clamouring for? The ruling has emboldened Massachusetts sodomite rights advocates to push their agenda in schools and has chilled the rights of those with an opposing viewpoint.
3.
13 high school students in Roseville, Calif., were counter-protesting GLSEN's "Day of Silence" by wearing shirts containing the message "Homosexuality is sin. Jesus can set you free." The school district ordered them to remove the shirts. Do only homosexuals have rights to free expression?
4.
The California Senate has approved a bill requiring "gay history" to be included in public school textbooks. That's not all. One provision of the bill would require all social studies textbooks to "study the role and contributions of "people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender". Why do such people get special recognition? Worse yet - mentions of "sexist" terms like 'father' and 'mother' will be removed from textbooks.
5.
Massachusetts homosexual-rights activists issued a judicial challenge to a proposed constitutional amendment to end same-sex "marriage." According to the GLAD, the state constitution doesn't permit citizen-initiated amendments to reverse judicial rulings. When the judge rules their way, his law is supreme, according to them. When judges rule against them, they lobby to change the law. Hypocrites.
6.
A company was sued by a pair of queer skaters who claimed they were harassed for holding hands. The company "has agreed to hold monthly gay-straight skate nights, to sign an anti-discrimination pledge and to contribute $5,000 to two gay groups." The company will also post placards saying it is promoting diversity and will require its workers to undergo sensitivity training. That company is run by bigger sissies than the hand-holding figure skaters.
7.
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review a ruling of the Washington Supreme Court granting parental rights to a lesbian in a child custody suit. Though it shouldn't be decided at the Federal level, how can a State allow a lesbian partner rights to children that are not hers, above the rights of the father?
8.
Sodomite activist judge strikes down ban on homosexual "marriage" that was approved by 76% of Georgia voters.
Now WHO are the real hateful, intolerant bigots? No wonder Pastor Ovadal calls them HomoFascists.
Earlier this spring was the incredible story of a librarian at Ohio State University at Mansfield who was met with a sexual harassment claim from three professors for simply suggesting that a few conservative books be included on a recommended reading list for incoming freshmen.
These all occurred within the past MONTH:
1. "Anti-Homosexual Bullying 'Endemic' in Schools, Study Says,"
2. "Parents' Suit Challenges Gay-Themed Book,"
3. "Christian Students Considering Lawsuit Over Suspensions,"
4. "California's 'Gay History' Bill Advances,"
5. "Gays Fight Citizens in Court,"
6. "Gay Ice Skaters Settle Hand-holding Harassment Case"
7. "Supreme Court Lets Lesbian Partner Be 'De Facto Parent.'"
8. "Activist Judge Strikes Down Ban On Homosexual Marriage"
1.
The first story claims that 64 percent of homosexual students "reported feeling unsafe at school because of their sexual orientation," according to GLSEN. Queers want laws forbidding "harassment" based on sexual orientation or gender expression. If these statistics are accurate, ordinary school policies against harassment suffice. Homosexuals shouldn't get any special status because of their vile practices.
2.
Two Massachusetts couples have filed a federal lawsuit against school officials because elementary school teachers were giving out and reading storybooks with gay themes without advance notification to parents. What happened to the wall of separation between church and state the liberals are always clamouring for? The ruling has emboldened Massachusetts sodomite rights advocates to push their agenda in schools and has chilled the rights of those with an opposing viewpoint.
3.
13 high school students in Roseville, Calif., were counter-protesting GLSEN's "Day of Silence" by wearing shirts containing the message "Homosexuality is sin. Jesus can set you free." The school district ordered them to remove the shirts. Do only homosexuals have rights to free expression?
4.
The California Senate has approved a bill requiring "gay history" to be included in public school textbooks. That's not all. One provision of the bill would require all social studies textbooks to "study the role and contributions of "people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender". Why do such people get special recognition? Worse yet - mentions of "sexist" terms like 'father' and 'mother' will be removed from textbooks.
5.
Massachusetts homosexual-rights activists issued a judicial challenge to a proposed constitutional amendment to end same-sex "marriage." According to the GLAD, the state constitution doesn't permit citizen-initiated amendments to reverse judicial rulings. When the judge rules their way, his law is supreme, according to them. When judges rule against them, they lobby to change the law. Hypocrites.
6.
A company was sued by a pair of queer skaters who claimed they were harassed for holding hands. The company "has agreed to hold monthly gay-straight skate nights, to sign an anti-discrimination pledge and to contribute $5,000 to two gay groups." The company will also post placards saying it is promoting diversity and will require its workers to undergo sensitivity training. That company is run by bigger sissies than the hand-holding figure skaters.
7.
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review a ruling of the Washington Supreme Court granting parental rights to a lesbian in a child custody suit. Though it shouldn't be decided at the Federal level, how can a State allow a lesbian partner rights to children that are not hers, above the rights of the father?
8.
Sodomite activist judge strikes down ban on homosexual "marriage" that was approved by 76% of Georgia voters.
Now WHO are the real hateful, intolerant bigots? No wonder Pastor Ovadal calls them HomoFascists.
8 Comments:
At 3:12 PM, Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
At 3:17 PM, T.G. said…
Previous comment deleted for profanity, here is what it said:
<< 1:have you ever been in a school lately? It's no wonder columbine happened. people hate so much, too much and normal laws will not suffice for anyone much less gay people. every day comments are made, every day they are ignored. no one gives a ****. why should they? like you said we don't give them any special treatment so **** them! >>
Columbine happened because two evolutionist socialists who hated Christians started shooting and nobody had a gun to stop them.
Homosexuals still do not need special privileges to protect their perverted, dangerous activities.
At 11:33 PM, Anonymous said…
Nice photo of you and Dick Ives. A little out of focus, though.
At 6:12 AM, T.G. said…
Sorry, nice try. Neither one of us has a moustache.
But that was a good shot :-)
At 7:20 AM, Anonymous said…
Oh, oh. If neither one of you has a mustache, you're both condemned according to the Leviticus.
At 7:32 AM, T.G. said…
Gimme the verse. Come on, step in the bear trap.
At 9:57 AM, Anonymous said…
wow, dont' this sound familiar???
I ain't bear bait!!
At 10:09 PM, T.G. said…
I didn't think you could back up your claims. All hot air and smoke. No substance.
Post a Comment
<< Home